Income Tax

Not providing certified copy of order, reasonable basis for condonation of delay in filing appeal

Not providing certified copy of penalty order was reasonable basis for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A)

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2679 (2018) (12) ITAT

This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) wherein the appeal of the assessee was dismissed at the admission stage as there was delay in filing of the appeal by the assessee.

The penalty order u/s 271(1)(b) was served on the assessee. However, the assessee had lost the said order and therefore, the assessee moved an application seeking certified copy of the order.

When the certified copy of the penalty order was supplied to the assessee, he preferred the appeal with the CIT(A).

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had requested for certified copy of the order.

The Tribunal opined that it would be reasonable to exclude the period during which the copy of the order was not provided while determining the period of delay which has happened in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) as no fault lied with the assessee.

Further, the Tribunal noted that once certified copy of the order was served on the assessee, the assessee had immediately filed the appeal.

The Tribunal opined that the assessee had a reasonable basis for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A).

In view of the above, the Tribunal condoned the delay and the set aside the matter to the file of  CIT(A) to decide the same on merit after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

20 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

4 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago