Income Tax

Order passed by Tribunal in remand proceedings during pendency of SLP-Remedy available

Order passed by the Tribunal in remand proceedings during pendency of SLP-Remedy available was filing ITA before High Court

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2892 (2019) (04) SC

In the instant case, the Hon’ble High Court had remanded the case to the Tribunal on the issue of deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in terms of 2001 amendment.

The assessee had approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court by way of Special Leave against the said order of the High Court whereby the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for reconsideration.

However, pending the special leave petition, the Tribunal, in pursuance of the impugned order remanding the case, had passed the final order in the instant matter.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that in such case the remedy available to the aggrieved was by way of filing an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the jurisdictional High Court against the said order.  

In view of the above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court which stood complied with by the Tribunal

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago