Income Tax

Penalty 271B deleted as notices uploaded on portal only & assessee was a divorcee lady

Penalty u/s 271B deleted as notices were uploaded on portal only, assessee being a divorcee lady could not access income tax portal

In a recent judgment ITAT has deleted the penalty u/s 271B as the notices were uploaded on the portal only and assessee was a divorcee lady and was defending false complaints filed by her husband and could not access income tax portal. 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3872 (2024) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A), NFAC in confirming the income tax penalty u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliances of the notice issued.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the impugned penalties have been levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings. Drawing attention of the Tribunal to the Assessment Order it was submitted that these notices were uploaded on the income tax portal and none of the notices were served on the assessee.

It was further submitted that the assessee is a divorcee lady living alone with her minor son. That her husband was already married to another lady before marriage with the assessee and her estranged husband has made false complaints with the income tax authorities to harass the assessee.

It was submitted that the assessee on the one hand is trying to cope up and look after her only minor son and on the other hand is defending the complaints filed by her husband.

It was submitted that non compliances of the notice was not intentional but due to the fact that such notices were never sent to the assessee and being a divorcee lady, the assessee could not look in the instant appeal, the assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in confirming the income tax portal.

The Tribunal opined that reasons explained for on compliance by the assessee were justified for want of proper service of the notice upon her.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to deleted the penalty.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT

Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…

3 days ago
  • tender

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…

3 days ago
  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

7 days ago