Income Tax

Penalty 271B deleted as notices uploaded on portal only & assessee was a divorcee lady

Penalty u/s 271B deleted as notices were uploaded on portal only, assessee being a divorcee lady could not access income tax portal

In a recent judgment ITAT has deleted the penalty u/s 271B as the notices were uploaded on the portal only and assessee was a divorcee lady and was defending false complaints filed by her husband and could not access income tax portal. 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3872 (2024) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A), NFAC in confirming the income tax penalty u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliances of the notice issued.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the impugned penalties have been levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings. Drawing attention of the Tribunal to the Assessment Order it was submitted that these notices were uploaded on the income tax portal and none of the notices were served on the assessee.

It was further submitted that the assessee is a divorcee lady living alone with her minor son. That her husband was already married to another lady before marriage with the assessee and her estranged husband has made false complaints with the income tax authorities to harass the assessee.

It was submitted that the assessee on the one hand is trying to cope up and look after her only minor son and on the other hand is defending the complaints filed by her husband.

It was submitted that non compliances of the notice was not intentional but due to the fact that such notices were never sent to the assessee and being a divorcee lady, the assessee could not look in the instant appeal, the assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in confirming the income tax portal.

The Tribunal opined that reasons explained for on compliance by the assessee were justified for want of proper service of the notice upon her.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to deleted the penalty.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted penalty for making a wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B

Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…

23 hours ago
  • GST

Value of taxable supply and rates notified Pan Masala / tobacco products

CBIC notifies GST rates and value of taxable supply for Biris, Pan Masala / tobacco products  Ministry of Finance(Department of…

1 day ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SOP for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers in Baggage Clearance

CBIC has issued a Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers responsible for Baggage Clearance According…

2 days ago