Income Tax

Penalty 271B deleted as notices uploaded on portal only & assessee was a divorcee lady

Penalty u/s 271B deleted as notices were uploaded on portal only, assessee being a divorcee lady could not access income tax portal

In a recent judgment ITAT has deleted the penalty u/s 271B as the notices were uploaded on the portal only and assessee was a divorcee lady and was defending false complaints filed by her husband and could not access income tax portal. 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3872 (2024) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A), NFAC in confirming the income tax penalty u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliances of the notice issued.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the impugned penalties have been levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings. Drawing attention of the Tribunal to the Assessment Order it was submitted that these notices were uploaded on the income tax portal and none of the notices were served on the assessee.

It was further submitted that the assessee is a divorcee lady living alone with her minor son. That her husband was already married to another lady before marriage with the assessee and her estranged husband has made false complaints with the income tax authorities to harass the assessee.

It was submitted that the assessee on the one hand is trying to cope up and look after her only minor son and on the other hand is defending the complaints filed by her husband.

It was submitted that non compliances of the notice was not intentional but due to the fact that such notices were never sent to the assessee and being a divorcee lady, the assessee could not look in the instant appeal, the assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in confirming the income tax portal.

The Tribunal opined that reasons explained for on compliance by the assessee were justified for want of proper service of the notice upon her.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to deleted the penalty.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

17 hours ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

19 hours ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

2 days ago
  • contract-law

UP Govt. notifies reduced rate of registration/stamp duty fees on lease agreements

Uttar Pradesh Government has notified reduced / concessional rate of registration and stamp duty fees on lease / rent agreements.…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

First-time experience in filing appeal a reasonable & bona fide cause for delay

First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…

4 days ago