Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted as assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving cooperation from assessee

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401

In the instant set of appeals filed by respective assessee(s) they had challenged the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

The only grievance in these batch of appeals was levy of penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliance to the notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the course of assessment proceedings.

The Tribunal noted that the assessment had been framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act.

The Tribunal opined that in all cases as the assessment orders had been framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, it proved that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings.

Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted In a recent judgment and order…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty set aside as Tax Audit Report not filed due to strained relationship with CA

ITAT set aside Penalty u/s 271B as Tax Audit Report was not filed due to strained relationship with CA In…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Unless request made, personal hearing not mandatory in faceless assessment – Patna HC

Unless request made, personal / oral hearing not mandatory and faceless assessment would be concluded without an oral hearing –…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Mere technical mistake in return cannot be a ground of disallowing a claim

Mere technical mistake made by assessee while filing up return cannot be a ground of disallowing the claim when such…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for land purchased in wife’s name SC stays HC Order

Denial of Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for agricultural land purchased in the name of wife Supreme Court stays High…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Surrounding circumstances, prudent investor behaviour key to creditworthiness

CIT(A) was justified in considering surrounding circumstances, the normal human conduct of a prudent investor, the probabilities to judge creditworthiness…

2 days ago