Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted as assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving cooperation from assessee

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401

In the instant set of appeals filed by respective assessee(s) they had challenged the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

The only grievance in these batch of appeals was levy of penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliance to the notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the course of assessment proceedings.

The Tribunal noted that the assessment had been framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act.

The Tribunal opined that in all cases as the assessment orders had been framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, it proved that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings.

Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago