Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT
Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401
In the instant set of appeals filed by respective assessee(s) they had challenged the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
The only grievance in these batch of appeals was levy of penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for non compliance to the notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the course of assessment proceedings.
The Tribunal noted that the assessment had been framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act.
The Tribunal opined that in all cases as the assessment orders had been framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, it proved that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings.
Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act.
Once assessee satisfies conditions mentioned in section 270AA, the Assessing Officer would be bound to grant immunity In a recent…
NTPC invited applications from CA/CMA as young professionals to join NTPC Projects/Stations as Executive Trainee, Finance. NTPC Limited has invited…
Allahabad High Court disposes GST appeals observing that the functioning of GST Appellate Tribunal are put to motion Allahabad High…
Date of dispatch of notice as per ITBA portal and date of communication by email may not necessarily be the…
In a recent judgment, Bombay High Court held that assignment of leasehold rights for consideration would not amount to supply…
ICAI revises eligibility criteria for empanelment of organizations to impart industrial training (Effective from 1st January, 2026) The Council of…