Income Tax

Petition in Delhi High Court for Tax Audit due date extension by FTAPS dismissed as withdrawn

Extension of Tax audit/ITR due date- FTAP withdraws the Petition in Delhi High Court in view of the CBDT Order extending the due dates to 31.10.2018

The division bench comprising of Hon’ble the Chief Justice passed the following order:

In view of the order dated 8th October, 2018 passed by the Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes extending the period for filing of return of income and reports of audit pertaining to Assessment Year 2018-2019 to 31st October, 2018, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the writ petition for the present.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had issued notice to CBDT with respect to Tax Audit due date extension for AY 2018-19.

Joining the cause for further extension of the due date for filing of audit reports and income tax return, Foundation of Tax and Accounting Professionals (FTAPS) have filed a PIL in Delhi High Court.

It is known that the due date for filing GSTR-1 has already been extended by the CBIC  to 31st OctoberWhen a seller files his GSTR-1, the information gets captured in GSTR 2A. It takes information of goods and/or services which have been purchased in a given month from the seller’s GSTR-1. In other words, GSTR 2A is a purchase-related tax return that is automatically generated for each business by the GST portal.

Signing of balance sheets without considering GST-2A is like false certification

It is learnt that the case / argument of the FTAPS was that signing of balance sheets without taking cognizance of final GST-2A would be like false certification on part of both assessee as well as auditor.

The Petition has been admitted and notice has been issued to CBDT to file the Counter. The case is list for next hearing in the second week of October 2018.

We will be updating the post asap.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

First-time experience in filing appeal a reasonable & bona fide cause for delay

First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…

19 hours ago
  • GST

Non-disclosure of destination place in documents no ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act.

Mere nondisclosure of place of destination in the documents cannot be a ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act.…

20 hours ago
  • arbitration

Charging of exorbitant interest in commercial transactions not against morality or justice

Imposition of exorbitant interest in contemporary commercial practices not against the fundamental policy of Indian Law, or against the morality…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessees not required to prove “source of the source‟ of funds Prior to Finance Act 2022

Assessees was  not required to prove the “source of the source‟ of funds received as unsecured loans Prior to the…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

During pendency before settlement commission, assessee have right to contest assessment

The contention that during the pendency of case before settlement commission, the assessee must give up his right to contest…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated income but only profit embedded

Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated as income and only estimated profit embedded in these transactions may only…

2 days ago