Income Tax

Power to grant personal hearing under Faceless Appeal Scheme 2020- SC to decide

Power to grant personal hearing under Faceless Appeal Scheme 2020- Supreme Court to decide if discretion be limited to Chief Commissioner and Director General only

CBDT in August 2020 notified Income Tax Faceless assessment Scheme 2020. Section 144B provides that in a case where a variation is proposed in the draft assessment order and an opportunity is provided to the assessee by serving a show cause notice as to why the assessment should not be completed as per the such draft or final draft or revised draft assessment order, the assessee if requested may request for personal hearing to make his oral submissions or present his case before the income-tax authority.

It further provides that for cases covered as above, the Chief Commissioner or the Director General in charge of the relevant Regional Faceless Assessment Centre (RFAC) may approve the request of the personal hearing via video conferencing/telephony.

On the lines of Faceless Assessment Scheme 2020, the CBDT has also notified the Faceless Appeal Scheme 2020. 

The Scheme provides that an appeal against an order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre shall lie before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. However, the assessee shall not be required to appear either personally or through authorised representative before the income-tax authority at the National Faceless Appeal Centre or Regional Faceless Appeal Centre or appeal unit.

However, like Faceless Assessment Scheme , in Faceless Appeal Scheme 2020 also a personal hearing may be requested to present oral submissions or present the case.

On such a request being made, the Chief Commissioner or the Director General in charge of the relevant Regional Faceless Assessment Centre (RFAC) may approve the request of the personal hearing via video conferencing/telephony. 

Courts/Tribunal have held that once the assessee requests for a personal hearing in the cases with variation, the Income Tax Authorities are under legal obligation to provide an opportunity for personal hearing.

However, the restriction on the power to grant opportunity of personal hearing to only Chief Commissioner or the Director General is under challenge in various High Courts on the ground that and that discretion to grant personal hearing under Faceless Appeal Scheme may not be left to the Chief Commissioner or the Director General alone.

In view of the above, CBDT has moved the Hon’ble Supreme Court to decide the issue. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has admitted the request on this issue. The decision shall have a bearing on the Faceless Assessment Scheme as well.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3549 (2021) (09) SC

It was the submission of the CBDT that the Department had a second look at the matter and had issued Faceless Appeal Scheme 2021 vide notification dated 28.12.2021 in terms whereof sub-clause 2 and 3 of Clause 12 stipulate that the appellant or his authorized representative can request for a personal hearing to make his oral submissions and the same “shall” be allowed by the concerned Commissioner (Appeals). 

In view of the above, the Apex Court has disposed off the petition filed by the CBDT.

Download SC Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

2 days ago