Income Tax

Processing of ITRs filed during FY 2018-19 u/s 139, in response to  notice u/s 142(1) or  u/s 119(2)(b)

Processing of ITRS filed during FY 2018-19 u/s 139, in response to notice u/s 142(1) or  u/s 119(2)(b) getting time barred 

ITBA-ITR Processing Instruction No- 10

DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEM)
ARA Center, Ground, Floor E-2,  Jhandewalan Extension
New Delhi – 110055

F.No. Pr. DGIT(S)/ITBA/ITR Processing/112/16-17/

Dated: 18.02.2020

To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/ CCsIT All Principal Director Generals of Income Tax/DGsIT
All Principal Commissioners of lncome-tax/CsIT/CsIT(Admin & TPS) All Principal Directors of Income Tax/DsIT

Subject:  Processing of Returns filed during Financial Year 2018-19 u/s 139, in response to  notice u/s 142(1) or  u/s 119(2)(b) of the I. T. Act, getting time barred for processing u/s 143(1) of the I.T. Act, on 31-03-2020-Regarding.

Sir/Madam ,

This is in reference to the subject mentioned above . Assessing Officers shall take following steps to clear the pendency of processing of Paper Returns or E-returns transferred by CPC-ITR due to verification of relief claimed u/s 90/90A or 91 of the I. T. Act or otherwise :

1. Valid Paper Returns: Assessing Officers must complete the data entry of all paper returns filed by eligible taxpayers and push the data for processing by CPC-ITR. For paper returns filed by non-eligible taxpayers e. , Non-Super Senior Citizen claiming  refund, these are to be invalidated by AO instead of modifying the values in Data  entry forms,  as  ultimately these  returns will be marked as defective  u/s 139(9) of the I. T. Act by CPC-ITR while processing the same . Therefore, AO must ensure accuracy in digitisation of paper ITRs in ITBA.

2. E-returns for AY 2017-18 or 2018-19 transferred  by  CPC: Assessing  Officers need to verify the e-returns transferred by CPC-ITR for verification of relief  u/s 90/90A or 91 of the I. T. Act upon transfer of rights by CPC-ITR. In such cases, after taking suitable action , AO needs to submit these returns to CPC-ITR for processing.

3. Return filed in response to Notice u/s 142(1) of the T.Act : It is seen that more than 2 lakhs of returns are filed by taxpayers in e-filing portal. These returns are transferred by CPC- ITR to AO for the purpose of validating the returns filed in response to notice u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act. For the purpose of validating and to avoid mistake by AO due to overlooking of facts of returns , following field is added in Return Receipt Register -7 Basic Return Details Screen:

Latest compliance date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO: This field will be mandatory in addition to Notice Date where return is filed u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act.

  • If filing date of return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act is greater than the Latest Compliance Date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO then such returns will be marked as invalid on saving the return data.
  • If filing date of return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act is less than or equal to the Latest Compliance Date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO then such returns w ill be treated as valid and can be submitted by AO for processing u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act.

Note:- All returns filed u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act, will be marked as invalid by the system , if AO does not take any action on or before 22-02-2020 . However, AO may be able to validate such returns again after entering the mandatory details as mentioned above.

4. Returns filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the T.Act, during financial year 2018-19: The Assessing Officer should enter the condonation details for validating such returns prior to be submitting the same to the CPC-ITR for processing.

Note:- All returns filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the IT Act, will be marked as invalid by the system , if AO does not abcaus.in take any action on or before 22-02-2020 . However, AO may be able to validate such returns again after entering the condonation order details.

5. All Assessing Officers must note that the returns pushed for processing u/s 143(1) of the IT Act , will be subject to the following :

  • Prima Facie Adjustment for Paper Returns : AO needs to issue notice in this regard and also modify the data entered to enable processing by CPC-ITR
  • Defective Paper Returns: Paper returns marked as defective by  CPC-ITR needs to be either corrected for any data entry mistake or are to be marked as invalid. The AO may issue notice u/s 139(9) for this purpose.
  • Fore-returns the PFA notices or defective notices will be issued by CPC-ITR and taxpayers are required to respond or file return u/s 139(9) within 15 days from the date of service of notice. Once new e-return is filed then same will be transferred back to AO and he needs to re-submit the same to CPC-ITR.
  • The  Assessing  Officer  will  be  required  to  approve  the  refund  or Demand determined by CPC-ITR in order to complete the processing and release of refund (after arrear demand adjustment u/s 245) by CPC-ITR.

Refunds cases will be subject to Range approval or subject to 241A compliance , therefore concerned authorities, AO, Range Head and PCIT must complete their approval pendency by 28-02-2020.

6. Users are advised to contact helpdesk in case of any issues in respect of ITBA.

a. URL of helpdesk- http://itbahelpdesk .net
b. Help desk number- 0120-2811200  (new)
c. Email ID- helpdesk@incometax.gov .in
d. Help desk Timings- 30 A.M . – 7.30 P.M. (Monday to Friday)

7. This issues with prior approval of the Pr. DGIT(Systems) , Delhi

Yours  faithfully ,

(Ashim Kumar  Modi)
Commissioner of Income Tax (ITBA)
Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) , Delhi

Download Instruction Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Not making available material forming basis of reopening shows AO had prejudged the issue

AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” was non-application of mind – High Court

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

HC declined to allow voluminous documents physically in Faceless Assessment

High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

4 days ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

5 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

5 days ago