Income Tax

Processing of returns u/s 143(1) which are pushed by CPC to Assessing Officers-CBDT Instruction

Processing of returns u/s 143(1) which are pushed by CPC to Assessing Officers. ITRs to be processed electronically on ITBA or manually with approval

CBDT has issued instructions for electronic or manual processing of income tax returns u/s 143(1) which are pushed to the Assessing Officers by the CPC.

Section 143(1D) of the Income  Tax Act, 1961 (Act) was brought in the statute from 01.07.2012 which provided that processing of the returns shall not be necessary where a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act has been issued . The provisions of section 143(1D) were subsequently amended vide Finance Act 2017 with effect from 01.04.2017 by inserting a proviso which states that provisions of this sub-section shall cease to apply to returns furnished for Assessment Year 2017-18 and onwards.

Thus from Assessment Year 2017-18, discretion of Assessing Officer in processing returns under scrutiny has been completely removed and therefore, all returns have to be processed as per provisions of section 143(1) of the Act. This is irrespective of the fact whether in cases under scrutiny, the Assessing Officer is contemplating taking recourse under section 241A of the Act to withhold the refund so arising on ground of concern for recovery of revenue.

It has been instructed that the returns pushed to the Assessing Officer for processing by the CPC are required to be processed electronically on the software for processing of returns on Income-tax Business Application (ITBA) which has been functioning since 31st October, 2017. However, in exceptional circumstances, whenever returns cannot be processed because of technical difficulties in functioning of ITBA, in order to provide an uninterrupted taxpayer service, the Assessing  Officer can also manually process the return that is pushed to them by the CPC with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT. However, before taking up the return for processing manually, the difficulty being faced in processing the return electronically on ITBA on a case to case basis would be referred to the Pr. DGIT (System,) who shall satisfy himself that due to technical difficulties the return cannot be processed electronically on ITBA within a reasonable period & thereafter, permit manual processing in that case. However, in all such cases, the Assessing Officers have to mandatorily upload the same in the system.

It has been instructed that to avoid arbitrariness, the returns of Assessment Year 2017-18 and onwards which are pushed by the CPC to the Assessing Officer for processing, as far as possible, shall be handled in a chronological manner.

Download CBDT Instruction Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago