Prosecution u/s 276CC – Whether default is willful or not is a fact to be decided by trial court on the basis of evidence adduced – High Court
ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3685 (2023) (03) HC
In the instant case, the assessee had filed a Petition before the Hon’ble High Court seeking quashing of Criminal Proceedings initiated against him by the Income Tax Department.
Against the Petitioner, the Income tax Department had initiated prosecution under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by filing criminal proceedings in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.
Section 276CC of the Act provides punishment for the offence of non filing of income tax return (ITR) with penalty and/or imprisonment depending on amount of tax sought to be evaded.
Before the Hon’ble High Court, the Petitioner took the ground that the failure to file ITR was not wilful.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that admitted fact was that the petitioner failed to file Income Tax Return in time for the relevant assessment year. A notice was issued to him under Section 148 of the Act to submit his return. In spite of the receipt of the notice, the Petitioner did not file the ITR. Under these circumstances the prosecution was lodged against him.
The Hon’ble High Court opined that the only specific ground taken by the Petitioner was that the failure was not willful which is a fact to be considered by the trial court on the basis of the evidence adduced before it.
The Hon’ble High Court stated that such disputed question of fact cannot be decided by it in a proceedings under Section 482 of CrPC.
Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court dismissed the Petition filed by the assessee.
Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…
No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…
A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…
Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…
Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…
Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…