Income Tax

Revised jurisdiction of DCIT/ACIT/ITO in National Capital Territory/Municipal Wards of Delhi – CBDT Order

Revised jurisdiction of Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officers in National Territory/Municipal Wards of Municipal  Corporation of Delhi

OFFICE OF THE
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-28
ROOM NO. 1205, 12th FLOOR, E-2 BLOCK, PRATYAKSH KAR BRAWAN
Dr. SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE CIVIC CENTRE, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG,
NEW DELHI-110002

F. No.JCIT/Range-28/Jurisdiction/2019-20/478

Dated: 03.10.2019

ORDER UNDER SECTION 120 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961

In view of the Order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-l O, New Delhi vide F.NO.Pr.CIT-1011/Jurisdiction/2019-201/876 dated 03.10.2019 on this subject and in supersession of all earlier orders, I, Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-28, New Delhi hereby direct that the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officers mentioned in Column No.2 of this Order shall exercise the powers and perform the functions of the Assessing Officers under the Act, concurrently, in respect of such cases or classes of cases specified in the corresponding entries in column (6) of the Order, of such persons or classes of persons specified in the corresponding entries in column (5) of the said order, in such territorial areas specified in the corresponding entries in column (4) of the said order, having their headquarters specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) of the said order, in respect of all incomes or classes of income thereof; except such cases, as are hereafter assigned under section 120 of the Act by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax or under section 127 of the Act to
any Assessing Officer.

i This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

(Sanjaya Kumar Chaursia)
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Range-28, New Delhi

Download Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

4 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago