Revised jurisdiction of DCIT/ACIT/ITO in National Capital Territory/Municipal Wards of Delhi – CBDT Order

Revised jurisdiction of Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officers in National Territory/Municipal Wards of Municipal  Corporation of Delhi

OFFICE OF THE
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-28
ROOM NO. 1205, 12th FLOOR, E-2 BLOCK, PRATYAKSH KAR BRAWAN
Dr. SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE CIVIC CENTRE, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG,
NEW DELHI-110002

F. No.JCIT/Range-28/Jurisdiction/2019-20/478

Dated: 03.10.2019

ORDER UNDER SECTION 120 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961

In view of the Order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-l O, New Delhi vide F.NO.Pr.CIT-1011/Jurisdiction/2019-201/876 dated 03.10.2019 on this subject and in supersession of all earlier orders, I, Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-28, New Delhi hereby direct that the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officers mentioned in Column No.2 of this Order shall exercise the powers and perform the functions of the Assessing Officers under the Act, concurrently, in respect of such cases or classes of cases specified in the corresponding entries in column (6) of the Order, of such persons or classes of persons specified in the corresponding entries in column (5) of the said order, in such territorial areas specified in the corresponding entries in column (4) of the said order, having their headquarters specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) of the said order, in respect of all incomes or classes of income thereof; except such cases, as are hereafter assigned under section 120 of the Act by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax or under section 127 of the Act to
any Assessing Officer.

i This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

(Sanjaya Kumar Chaursia)
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Range-28, New Delhi

Download Order Click Here >>

• AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT
• Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC
• Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation
• ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination
• Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A