Income Tax

Revision under section 263 is not to set aside merely unfavourable orders and bring to tax some more money to the treasury-ITAT

In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has interpreted the objective and scope of invoking revisionary powers of Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as under:

  1. The provisions of section 263 cannot be invoked to correct each and every type of mistake or error committed by the AO.
  2. The ambit of interference under section 263 is not to set aside merely unfavourable orders and bring to tax some more money to the treasury.
  3. The section is not enacted to get a sheer escapement of revenue which is taken care of in other provisions of the Act.
  4. Prejudice that is contemplated under section 263 is the prejudice to the income-tax administration as a whole.
  5. Section 263 is to be invoked not as a jurisdictional corrective or as a review of a subordinate’s order in exercise of the supervisory power.
  6. Section 263 is to be invoked and employed only for setting right distortions and prejudices to the revenue, which is a unique conception, which is to be understood in the context of and in the interests of the Revenue administration. 

Case Law Details:
I.T.A .No.-3007/Del/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10
Modicare Limited vs CIT
date of Judgment: 19/04/2016

download full judgment

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

58 mins ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago