Income Tax

Selection of scrutiny for the cases selected manually on the basis of recommendations of CPC for AY 2013-14

Selection of scrutiny for the cases selected manually on the basis of recommendations of CPC for AY 2013-14

AST- Instruction No. 141

DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEMS)
ARA Centre, Ground Floor, E-2,
Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055

F.No. DGIT(S)/ADG(S)-2/CASS/2014-15                                                                       

Dated: 22.03.2016

To,
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax All Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax
All Principal Commissioners of Income-Tax
All Commissioners of Income-Tax (CO & Admn.)

Sir/Madam,

Sub:-  Reasons for selection of scrutiny for the cases selected manually on the basis of recommendations  of CPC-A.Y. 2013-14-  reg.

Communications have been received from field offices that the Assessing Officers are unable to view the reasons for selection for scrutiny in the ITD system for the cases which are manually selected on the basis of suggestions by CPC as the window to retrieve the reasons has been disabled.

The functionality for viewing such cases which are selected by AO under Manual Scrutiny on the basis of suggestions by CPC for A.Y . 2013-14 and for which order u/s. 143(3) of the Act has still not been passed, has been enabled in the lTD system and can be accessed by entering the following path in ITD System.

AST → Processing→ CPC Interface→ List of scrutiny cases from CPC”

Yours faithfully,

Sanjeev Singh
Addl Director general (Systems)-2

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago