Income Tax

Do taxpayers have to re-register DSC / Passwords on new e-filing portal again ?

Do taxpayers have to re-register their DSC and re-generate passwords on the new e-filing portal again from June 7th onwards?

The Income Tax Department is going to launch a new E-filing website i.e. www.incometax.gov.in on 7th June 2021. In preparation of the transition to the new system, the existing E-filing portal will not be available from 1st June 2021 to 6th June 2021.

In view of the change in the domain name of the new website, taxpayers have to register their digital signatures certificates (DSC) again in the new income tax e-filing portal.

DSCs are the digital equivalent (electronic format) of physical or paper certificates.  Digital Signatures are legally admissible in a Court of Law, as provided under the provisions of IT Act, 2000.

Under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, authentication of ITRs/Forms etc. by means of a Digital Signature is mandatory for specified taxpayers/professionals. 

However, migration of the digital signature saved on income tax portal to the new income tax e-filing website is not possible due to security and technical reasons and the users have to re-register their DSC again on the new portal.

In view of the above, the e-filing team of the Income Tax Department is said to be sending emails advising users to re-register their current valid DSC on the new e-filing portal https://www.incometax.gov.in from June 7th onwards.

However, since user account passwords on the hitherto e-filing portal are stored in encrypted mode, whether they can be successfully migrated to the new domain is another question which has not been addressed by the ITD. It can be assumed that the department shall be able to migrate them too. In the event of non migration of the encrypted millions of user passwords, taxpayers might need to regenerate password also.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

9 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

1 day ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

2 days ago