Income Tax

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer – ITAT Order

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer- ITAT directs Assessing Officer (AO) to give credit of TDS to the assessee after verification

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2782 (2019) (02) ITAT

The sole issue involved in the instant appeal was that the CIT(A) had not allowed credit for TDS which was deducted from the assessee but was not appearing in Form 26AS.

The assessee had filed a rectification request u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) However, the TDS credit was not allowed.

Though the CIT(A) observed that apparently the deductor had mentioned wrong PAN in the TDS return and hence the TDS in question was not appearing in 26AS. However, the CIT(A) was of the view that this defect had to be rectified by the deductor and unless, this was done, credit of tax could not be given to the correct deductee as credit might have gone to the wrong PAN holder in whose name TDS had been shown by the deductor.

Therefore, the CIT(A) held that there was no infirmity in the order passed u/s 154 of the Act in allowing credit for TDS against which wrong PAN of the assessee had been shown by the deductor.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee filed copy of Form No. 26AS and a screen shot taken from Income Tax website and ITD system showing wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer not in existence. The assessee also filed communication from employer in this regard.

The assessee relied ipon the CBDT Instruction no. 275/29/2014-IT-(B) which instructed the Income Tax Officials not to enforce demands on account of tds credit mismatch and submitted that the AO may be directed to allow credit of the TDS.

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the AO for verification of TDS allowable to the assessee from the documents to be furnished by the assessee before him and allow credit if satisfied with the verification of the documents.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

21 hours ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Case remanded in absence of finding if disallowance u/s 40A(3) covered by Rule 6DD

Case remanded as no finding was given whether cash payments disallowed u/s 40A(3) were covered by Rule 6DD under Income…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For investment in share capital, source of investment is outside the control of the investee company

In case of investment in share capital, the source of investment may remain outside the control of the investee company.…

6 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI issues revised Code of Ethics (13th edition)- Applicable Dates

ICAI issues revised Code of Ethics (13th edition) ICAI has released revised Code of Ethics (13th edition). The revised Code…

1 week ago
  • SEBI

Modified Norms for Nomination in Demat Accounts and Mutual Fund Folio

Modified Norms for Nomination in Demat Accounts and Mutual Fund Folio SEBI has modified Norms on Nomination to be implemented…

2 weeks ago