Income Tax

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer – ITAT Order

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer- ITAT directs Assessing Officer (AO) to give credit of TDS to the assessee after verification

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2782 (2019) (02) ITAT

The sole issue involved in the instant appeal was that the CIT(A) had not allowed credit for TDS which was deducted from the assessee but was not appearing in Form 26AS.

The assessee had filed a rectification request u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) However, the TDS credit was not allowed.

Though the CIT(A) observed that apparently the deductor had mentioned wrong PAN in the TDS return and hence the TDS in question was not appearing in 26AS. However, the CIT(A) was of the view that this defect had to be rectified by the deductor and unless, this was done, credit of tax could not be given to the correct deductee as credit might have gone to the wrong PAN holder in whose name TDS had been shown by the deductor.

Therefore, the CIT(A) held that there was no infirmity in the order passed u/s 154 of the Act in allowing credit for TDS against which wrong PAN of the assessee had been shown by the deductor.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee filed copy of Form No. 26AS and a screen shot taken from Income Tax website and ITD system showing wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer not in existence. The assessee also filed communication from employer in this regard.

The assessee relied ipon the CBDT Instruction no. 275/29/2014-IT-(B) which instructed the Income Tax Officials not to enforce demands on account of tds credit mismatch and submitted that the AO may be directed to allow credit of the TDS.

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the AO for verification of TDS allowable to the assessee from the documents to be furnished by the assessee before him and allow credit if satisfied with the verification of the documents.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

23 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Amendments proposed in TDS and related provisions by Budget 2026-27

Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…

9 hours ago
  • Custom

Baggage Rules 2026 rationalised, other newly introduced Custom reforms

Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…

20 hours ago