Income Tax

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer – ITAT Order

TDS credit for wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer- ITAT directs Assessing Officer (AO) to give credit of TDS to the assessee after verification

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2782 (2019) (02) ITAT

The sole issue involved in the instant appeal was that the CIT(A) had not allowed credit for TDS which was deducted from the assessee but was not appearing in Form 26AS.

The assessee had filed a rectification request u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) However, the TDS credit was not allowed.

Though the CIT(A) observed that apparently the deductor had mentioned wrong PAN in the TDS return and hence the TDS in question was not appearing in 26AS. However, the CIT(A) was of the view that this defect had to be rectified by the deductor and unless, this was done, credit of tax could not be given to the correct deductee as credit might have gone to the wrong PAN holder in whose name TDS had been shown by the deductor.

Therefore, the CIT(A) held that there was no infirmity in the order passed u/s 154 of the Act in allowing credit for TDS against which wrong PAN of the assessee had been shown by the deductor.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee filed copy of Form No. 26AS and a screen shot taken from Income Tax website and ITD system showing wrong PAN mentioned in TDS return by employer not in existence. The assessee also filed communication from employer in this regard.

The assessee relied ipon the CBDT Instruction no. 275/29/2014-IT-(B) which instructed the Income Tax Officials not to enforce demands on account of tds credit mismatch and submitted that the AO may be directed to allow credit of the TDS.

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the AO for verification of TDS allowable to the assessee from the documents to be furnished by the assessee before him and allow credit if satisfied with the verification of the documents.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Excise/Custom

Before staying CESTAT order High Court should have framed substantial questions of law – SC

Before staying CESTAT order the High Court should have framed the substantial questions of law and thereafter could have passed…

13 minutes ago
  • CA CS CMA

CA issuing Form 15CB not required check genuineness of documents submitted

Chartered Accountant issuing Form 15CB not required check genuineness or otherwise of documents submitted by his clients – Supreme Court…

3 hours ago
  • GST

Ongoing investigation qua absconding person, no ground to deny bail to arrested person

Ongoing investigation qua absconding person, cannot be a ground to deny bail to person against whom the investigations have been…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Accommodation entry operators also obtain PAN, file ITRs, open bank account

Accommodation entry operators also routinely obtain PAN, file ITRs, and maintain bank accounts, to give a facade of legitimacy to…

9 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI sets up two new branches : at Morbi and Bhiwandi

ICAI sets up two new branches : at Morbi and Bhiwandi The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has…

15 hours ago
  • Finance Ministry

Govt. notifies amended Protocol of India & Belgium for DTAA & Fiscal Evasion of taxes

Central Government notifies amended Protocol between India and Belgium for Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion…

1 day ago