TDS to be deducted by Individual/HUF u/s 194M on payment exceeding 50 lakhs to contractors and professionals even for personal work w.e.f. 01.09.2019
At present, under Income Tax Act, there is no provision placing a liability on an individual or Hindu undivided family (HUF) to deduct tax at source on any payment made to a resident contractor or professional when it is for personal use.
Further, if the individual or HUF is carrying on business or profession which is not subjected to audit, there is also no obligation to deduct tax at source on such payment to a resident, even if the payment is for the purpose of business or profession.
To plug this loophole for possible tax evasion, the Union Budget 2019-20 has been proposed to insert a new section 194M in the Act to provide for levy of TDS at the rate of 5% on the sum, or the aggregate of sums, paid or credited in a year on account of contractual work or professional fees by an individual or a Hindu undivided family, not required to deduct tax at source under section 194C and 194J of the Act, if such sum, or aggregate of such sums, exceeds fifty lakh rupees in a year.
However, in order to reduce the compliance burden, it has been proposed that such individuals or HUFs shall be able to deposit the tax deducted using their Permanent Account Number (PAN) and shall not be required to obtain Tax deduction Account Number (TAN).
This amendment will take effect from 1st September, 2019.
Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…
ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…