Income Tax

Value of goods lying at port can be at cost or market price. SC dismisses SLP of Revenue

Value of goods lying at port but not exported can be at cost or market price at the option and regular practice of the assessee. SC dismisses SLP of the Revenue

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3047 (2019) (07) SC

The Revenue had challenged the order of the Tribunal against the respondent assessee. The High Court framed the following questions of law:

1. Whether the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act is perverse as it is non reasoned?

2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to set off interest paid on borrowed funds from interest income earned held to be taxable under the head “income from other sources” under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

However, the Hon’ble High Court declined to frame substantial question of law on the third issue raised by the Revenue on method of accounting adopted by the assessee with regard to the goods which were lying at the port which had not been exported.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that as per the finding of the Tribunal title in the goods ready for shipment had not transferred to the foreign buyers.

Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court opined that the goods lying at the port ready for shipment was stock in hand that could be valued at cost or market price, at the option and as per regular practice of the assessee.

According to the Hon’ble High Court the mere fact that for sales tax purposes the value of the goods lying at the port was taken at the invoice value would not make any difference. Sales tax computation and declaration would be made in accordance of the provision of the Sales Tax Act.

Aggrieved by the order of the Hon’ble High Court, the Department filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

The Division Bench headed by the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and on perusing the relevant material dismissed the SLP as without any merit.    

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

4 days ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Flower bed area not included in “built up area” to calculate eligible limit u/s 80IB(10)

Flower bed area could not be included in the definition of “built up area” to calculate eligible limit of 1000…

7 days ago