Without stating whether notices were served on assessee, CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee for non-appearance – ITAT
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2879 (2019) (04) ITAT
In the instant case, the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the assessee failed to put in appearance on the dates of hearing by him.
However, the case of the assessee was that he had not received the notice of hearing sent by the CIT(A) and therefore was unable to appear before him on the dates of hearing fixed.
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) in his order, mentioned the date of notice of hearing sent to the assessee. However, the CIT(A) had not stated in the order whether these notices were served on the assessee.
In view of the above, the Tribunal opined that the CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee for non-appearance by the assessee on the date of hearings fixed by him.
Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal back to his file for adjudicating afresh after allowing reasonable and proper opportunity of the hearing to the assessee.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…