Judgments

National Law University Delhi admission process to Ph.D. programme faulty-Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in a recently delivered judgment has observed that that all does not appear to be well with the admission process of the National Law University, Delhi in admission to Ph.D. programme. The Court had issued a direction to the University to rectify/reconsider the admission criteria before commencement of the admissions to the Ph.D. programme in the year 2016  so as to rule out the possibility of officials of the University involved in the admission process granting admission at their desire but admissions are granted strictly as per declared criteria. 

The judgment was delivered on 19/04/2016 while disposing off writ petition 7582/2012 in the case of Amita Agarwal vs. National Lw University & Ors whereby the petitioner had challenged her non admission in Ph.D.

download full judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

3 hours ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Flower bed area not included in “built up area” to calculate eligible limit u/s 80IB(10)

Flower bed area could not be included in the definition of “built up area” to calculate eligible limit of 1000…

3 days ago