Supreme Court

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes.

Supreme Court today refused the Central Government plea to stop various High Courts from entertaining  and/or listening pending petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes currency of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000/-.

Supreme Court today, pointed out that the people are suffering due to demonetisation scheme. The Bench headed by Hon’ble Chief Justice remarked that due to the currency crunch,  people are going frantic. The Court also urged Attorney General not to dispute this fact.

As per media reports, the Apex Court even warn of riots due to mismanagement in the Scheme.

The Court refusing to entertain the Central Government’s plea remarked that different petitions filed in High Courts would only go to show what kind of problems people are facing and by stopping them the actual magnitude of the problem could not be known.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal opposing the petition of the Government pleaded that people are having great struggle in getting their legitimately earned money. He also drew the attention of the Hon’ble Court on the high numbers of deaths of the people due to badly managed demonetisation scheme.

The case was ordered to be listed for next hearing on 25-11-2016 when the original PIL challenging the demonetisation is coming up for the hearing.

Meanwhile it is learnt that in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the Kolkata High Court, today, though refused to interfere in Government’s policy, stated that there had been lack of homework sincerity in implementation of the scheme which has caused public distress.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

22 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

4 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago