Supreme Court

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes.

Supreme Court today refused the Central Government plea to stop various High Courts from entertaining  and/or listening pending petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes currency of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000/-.

Supreme Court today, pointed out that the people are suffering due to demonetisation scheme. The Bench headed by Hon’ble Chief Justice remarked that due to the currency crunch,  people are going frantic. The Court also urged Attorney General not to dispute this fact.

As per media reports, the Apex Court even warn of riots due to mismanagement in the Scheme.

The Court refusing to entertain the Central Government’s plea remarked that different petitions filed in High Courts would only go to show what kind of problems people are facing and by stopping them the actual magnitude of the problem could not be known.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal opposing the petition of the Government pleaded that people are having great struggle in getting their legitimately earned money. He also drew the attention of the Hon’ble Court on the high numbers of deaths of the people due to badly managed demonetisation scheme.

The case was ordered to be listed for next hearing on 25-11-2016 when the original PIL challenging the demonetisation is coming up for the hearing.

Meanwhile it is learnt that in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the Kolkata High Court, today, though refused to interfere in Government’s policy, stated that there had been lack of homework sincerity in implementation of the scheme which has caused public distress.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 on instance of Assessing Officer

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act upon a proposal from the Assessing Officer…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t disturb income returned by assessee, without issue of notice u/s 143(2) – ITAT

If AO intends to disturb income returned by assessee, it is mandatory on his part to issue notice under section…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Source of cash being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat is plausible

Source of cash deposit being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat was held plausible and addition u/s…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CPC was not justified in making the disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for non deduction of TDS

TDS deductibility being debatable issue and not an apparent incorrect claim, CPC was not justified in making the disallowance In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books

No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…

2 days ago
  • arbitration

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago