Supreme Court

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes

SC refuses stop High Courts listening demonetisation petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes.

Supreme Court today refused the Central Government plea to stop various High Courts from entertaining  and/or listening pending petitions challenging the move to withdraw old bank notes currency of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000/-.

Supreme Court today, pointed out that the people are suffering due to demonetisation scheme. The Bench headed by Hon’ble Chief Justice remarked that due to the currency crunch,  people are going frantic. The Court also urged Attorney General not to dispute this fact.

As per media reports, the Apex Court even warn of riots due to mismanagement in the Scheme.

The Court refusing to entertain the Central Government’s plea remarked that different petitions filed in High Courts would only go to show what kind of problems people are facing and by stopping them the actual magnitude of the problem could not be known.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal opposing the petition of the Government pleaded that people are having great struggle in getting their legitimately earned money. He also drew the attention of the Hon’ble Court on the high numbers of deaths of the people due to badly managed demonetisation scheme.

The case was ordered to be listed for next hearing on 25-11-2016 when the original PIL challenging the demonetisation is coming up for the hearing.

Meanwhile it is learnt that in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the Kolkata High Court, today, though refused to interfere in Government’s policy, stated that there had been lack of homework sincerity in implementation of the scheme which has caused public distress.

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Bail granted to a CA accused in a GST evasion of more than 40 crores

Allahabad High Court grants bail to Chartered Accountant accused in a GST evasion to the tune of more than 40…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Every provision invoked casts a different onus, quoting wrong section prejudice the assessee

Every provision invoked casts a different sort of onus on the assessee – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 towards bogus…

7 hours ago
  • Insurance

Liability under MV Act can’t be decided on the grounds of sympathy alone – Supreme Court

Liability under the Motor Vehicles Act can’t be decided on the grounds of sympathy alone but must be established by…

19 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI notifies dates of CA Foundation, Intermediate & Final Exams May 2026

ICAI notifies Dates of CA Foundation, Intermediate and Final Exams May 2026 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Interest u/s 234A can’t be levied on self-assessment tax paid before due date of filing ITR

Interest under section 234A cannot be levied on self-assessment tax paid before the due date of filing of return of…

23 hours ago
  • SEBI

SEBI defers timeline for implementation of Phase III of Nomination

SEBI defers timeline for implementation of Phase III of Nomination SEBI had issued a circular on “Revise and Revamp Nomination…

2 days ago