Labour Laws

Employer to inform employee rights to compensation in writing and electronically immediately at the time of employment

Employer to inform employee rights to compensation in writing as well as through electronic means immediately at the time of employment 

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
(Legislative Department)

New Delhi, the 12th April, 2017/Chaitra 22, 1939 (Saka)

The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 12th April, 2017, and is hereby published for general information:—

THE EMPLOYEE’S COMPENSATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2017 NO. 11 OF 2017

[12th April, 2017.]

An Act further to amend the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-eighth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—

Short title and commencement
1. (1) This Act may be called the Employee’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2017

(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.

Insertion of new section 17A.

2. In the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), after section 17, the following section shall be inserted, namely:—

17.A Duty of employer to inform employee of his rights.
“17A. Every employer shall immediately at the time of employment of an employee, inform the employee of his rights to compensation under this Act, in writing as well as through electronic means, in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area of employment, as may be understood by the employee.”.

Amendment of section 18A.

3. In the principal Act, in section 18A, in sub-section (1),—
(i) in clause (d), for the word and figures “section 16,”, the words and figures “section 16, or” shall be substituted;
(ii) after clause (d), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:— “(e) fails to inform the employee of his rights to compensation as required under section 17A,”;
(iii) in the long line, for the words “which may extend to five thousand rupees”, the words “which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees” shall be substituted.

Amendment of section 30

4. In the principal Act, in section 30, in sub-section (1), in the first proviso, for the words “three hundred rupees”, the words “ten thousand rupees or such higher amount as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify” shall be substituted

Omission of section 30A

5. Section 30A of the principal Act shall be omitted

DR. G. NARAYANA RAJU,
Secretary to the Govt. of India.

CORRIGENDUM

The Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016 (No. 44 of 2016), as Published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1, Issue No. 51, dated the 16th August, 2016, at page NO. 2, in line 13, for ‘ “securitisation or” ’ read ‘ “securitisation company or” ’.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago