Directors of struck off companies can not incorporate companies, make application for name availability
After directions of Department of Financial Services to bank to freeze bank accounts of more than 2 lakhs companies that have been struck off by the RoC, MCA has issued an advisory to the Directors of such companies for refraining from the following activities:
Directors disqualified under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and who are associated with struck off companies (Section 248) are advised not to make any application for Name Availability (INC-1), Incorporation of Companies (INC-7/SPICe-INC-32/URC-1/INC-12). It has been further stated that any person disqualified under section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 is advised not to act as director during the period of the disqualification and not to file any document or application with MCA as the same shall be summarily rejected by the Central Registration Centre(CRC).
However, this shall be without prejudice to the liability of the said person for violation of section 164(2) read with section 167 of the Act including the action under section 448 r/w 447 of the wherever warranted.
Further, attention is drawn to the provisions of Section 7(5) and 7(6) which, inter-alia, provides that furnishing of any false or incorrect particulars of any information or suppression of any material information shall attract punishment for fraud under Section 447.
Attention is also drawn to the provisions of Section 448 and 449 which provide for punishment for false statement and punishment for false evidence respectively.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…