MCA

Out of disqualified directors majority were directors of struck off companies

Out of disqualified directors majority of them were directors of struck off companies 

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, in a press release issued today has revealed that out of 3,09,619 disqualified directors, 2,10,116 number of disqualified directors were directors on the Board of struck off companies

The provisions for disqualification of directors are prescribed under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013.  Section 164(2)(a) prescribes that no person who is or has been a director of a company which has not filed Financial Statements or Annual Returns for any continuous period of three financial years shall be eligible to be re-appointed as director of that company or appointed as director in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company fails to do so.

Section 167(1) (a) of the Act also prescribes that the office of a director shall become vacant in case he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in Section 164 of the Act.  Further, Rule 14(2) of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors), Rules, 2014 requires the companies to intimate the particulars of their directors on such failure by filing a prescribed form DIR-9 to Registrar of Companies [ ROCs].  3,09,619 Directors were  identified as disqualified under Section 164(2)(a) read with Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 for non-filing of Financial Statements or Annual Returns for a continuous period of immediately preceding 3 (three) financial years (2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16).  Further, Section 248(1)(c) provides for removal of name of company from the register of companies if it is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of 2 (two) immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under Section 455 of the Act.

In a drive launched by MCA, based on the above mentioned provision, 2.97 lakh companies were identified under this category as on 31.03.2017 and after following due process, the names of 2,26,166 companies were struck off from the register of companies as on 31.12.2017.  Out of the above mentioned 3,09,619 disqualified directors, 2,10,116 number of disqualified directors were directors on the Board of struck off companies.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago