MCA

ROC Shillong show cause notice to 37 LLP for striking off names

ROC Shillong show cause notice to 37 LLP for striking off name for not filing any financial statements for the last two preceding financial years.

PUBLIC NOTICE
(Pursuant to Rule 37(2) ofLLP Rules, 2009)

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Office of the Registrar of Companies
Morello Building, Ground Floor Kachary Road
Shilong-793001, Meghalaya

Public Notice No.:RoC/Shill/LLP/Sec 75/                                                                                         

Dated:   13.07.2017

Reference:

In the matter of Striking off of LLPs under Section 75 of LLP Act, 2008 read with Rule 37 of LLP Rules, 2009

1. Notice is hereby given that the Registrar has a reasonable cause to believe that

“That the following LLPs in List “A” (List of 37 Nos. of LLPs) have not been carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years.”

And. Therefore proposes to remove/Strike off the names of the above mentioned LLPs from the Register and dissolve them unless a cause is shown to the contrary, within one month from the date of this notice.

2. Any person objecting to the proposed removal/striking off of name of the LLPs from the Register of LLPs may send his/her objection to the office address mentioned hereinabove within one month of the date of publication of this notice.

(Chandan Kumar)
Registrar of Companies,North Eastern Region, Shillong

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago