MCA

ROC Shillong show cause notice to 37 LLP for striking off names

ROC Shillong show cause notice to 37 LLP for striking off name for not filing any financial statements for the last two preceding financial years.

PUBLIC NOTICE
(Pursuant to Rule 37(2) ofLLP Rules, 2009)

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Office of the Registrar of Companies
Morello Building, Ground Floor Kachary Road
Shilong-793001, Meghalaya

Public Notice No.:RoC/Shill/LLP/Sec 75/                                                                                         

Dated:   13.07.2017

Reference:

In the matter of Striking off of LLPs under Section 75 of LLP Act, 2008 read with Rule 37 of LLP Rules, 2009

1. Notice is hereby given that the Registrar has a reasonable cause to believe that

“That the following LLPs in List “A” (List of 37 Nos. of LLPs) have not been carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years.”

And. Therefore proposes to remove/Strike off the names of the above mentioned LLPs from the Register and dissolve them unless a cause is shown to the contrary, within one month from the date of this notice.

2. Any person objecting to the proposed removal/striking off of name of the LLPs from the Register of LLPs may send his/her objection to the office address mentioned hereinabove within one month of the date of publication of this notice.

(Chandan Kumar)
Registrar of Companies,North Eastern Region, Shillong

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

24 mins ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago