Four Shareholders Directors appointed in SBI Central Board
STATE BANK OF INDIA
(Constituted under the State Bank of India Act,1955)
NOTICE
Mumbai, the 19th June, 2017
No. BOD&GO/VKK/211.—Further to the Notice dated 02.05.2017, published in Gazette of India on 05.05.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 07.05.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), and Notice dated 30.05.2017 published in Gazette of India on 02.06.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 01.06.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), the General Meeting of the Shareholders of State Bank of India was held on Thursday, the 15th June, 2017 at 11.00 a.m. at “Y.B. Chavan Auditorium”, Y.B. Chavan Centre, General Jagannath Bhosale Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (Maharashtra), to elect four Shareholders’ Directors to the Central Board of the Bank under Section 19(c) of the State Bank of India Act, 1955:
2. The meeting was held in terms of Regulation 40(4) of SBI General Regulations, 1955. As the number of valid nominations were 10 against the 4 notified vacancies, election was carried out through ballot in the above general meeting of the Shareholders of the Bank.
3. After the election proceedings the following four candidates who secured highest number of votes polled were declared elected as Directors to the Central Board of the Bank, for a term of three years w.e.f. 26th June, 2017 to 25th June, 2020:
| Sr. No. | Name of the Director elected | Address |
| 1. | Shri Sanjiv Malhotra | 6, Motabhoy Mansion, Maharshi Karve Road, Churchgate, Mumbai – 400020 |
| 2. | Shri Pravin Hari Kutumbe | 703, Inder Towers, Kaka Saheb Gadgil Marg, Opp. Zandu Pharma, Prabha Devi, S O, Mumbai- 400025 |
| 3. | Shri Bhaskar Pramanik | 01PHE, Skycourt Laburnum Sushant Lok, Sector- 28, Gurgaon-122002 |
| 4. | Shri Basant Seth | Flat No 304, Kalpana Tower, 3/16, Vishnupuri, Kanpur-208002 |
Praveen Kumar Gupta, Managing Director
(Compliance & Risk)
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./114/17]
Corporate Centre,
State Bank Bhavan,
Madame Cama Road,
Mumbai – 400 021
Date: 16th June, 2017
AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…
Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…
High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…
The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…
Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…
Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…