Four Shareholders Directors appointed in SBI Central Board
STATE BANK OF INDIA
(Constituted under the State Bank of India Act,1955)
NOTICE
Mumbai, the 19th June, 2017
No. BOD&GO/VKK/211.—Further to the Notice dated 02.05.2017, published in Gazette of India on 05.05.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 07.05.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), and Notice dated 30.05.2017 published in Gazette of India on 02.06.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 01.06.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), the General Meeting of the Shareholders of State Bank of India was held on Thursday, the 15th June, 2017 at 11.00 a.m. at “Y.B. Chavan Auditorium”, Y.B. Chavan Centre, General Jagannath Bhosale Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (Maharashtra), to elect four Shareholders’ Directors to the Central Board of the Bank under Section 19(c) of the State Bank of India Act, 1955:
2. The meeting was held in terms of Regulation 40(4) of SBI General Regulations, 1955. As the number of valid nominations were 10 against the 4 notified vacancies, election was carried out through ballot in the above general meeting of the Shareholders of the Bank.
3. After the election proceedings the following four candidates who secured highest number of votes polled were declared elected as Directors to the Central Board of the Bank, for a term of three years w.e.f. 26th June, 2017 to 25th June, 2020:
| Sr. No. | Name of the Director elected | Address |
| 1. | Shri Sanjiv Malhotra | 6, Motabhoy Mansion, Maharshi Karve Road, Churchgate, Mumbai – 400020 |
| 2. | Shri Pravin Hari Kutumbe | 703, Inder Towers, Kaka Saheb Gadgil Marg, Opp. Zandu Pharma, Prabha Devi, S O, Mumbai- 400025 |
| 3. | Shri Bhaskar Pramanik | 01PHE, Skycourt Laburnum Sushant Lok, Sector- 28, Gurgaon-122002 |
| 4. | Shri Basant Seth | Flat No 304, Kalpana Tower, 3/16, Vishnupuri, Kanpur-208002 |
Praveen Kumar Gupta, Managing Director
(Compliance & Risk)
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./114/17]
Corporate Centre,
State Bank Bhavan,
Madame Cama Road,
Mumbai – 400 021
Date: 16th June, 2017
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…