Four Shareholders Directors appointed in SBI Central Board
STATE BANK OF INDIA
(Constituted under the State Bank of India Act,1955)
NOTICE
Mumbai, the 19th June, 2017
No. BOD&GO/VKK/211.—Further to the Notice dated 02.05.2017, published in Gazette of India on 05.05.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 07.05.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), and Notice dated 30.05.2017 published in Gazette of India on 02.06.2017 and in three daily newspapers on 01.06.2017 (Times of India, Navbharat Times and Navshakti), the General Meeting of the Shareholders of State Bank of India was held on Thursday, the 15th June, 2017 at 11.00 a.m. at “Y.B. Chavan Auditorium”, Y.B. Chavan Centre, General Jagannath Bhosale Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (Maharashtra), to elect four Shareholders’ Directors to the Central Board of the Bank under Section 19(c) of the State Bank of India Act, 1955:
2. The meeting was held in terms of Regulation 40(4) of SBI General Regulations, 1955. As the number of valid nominations were 10 against the 4 notified vacancies, election was carried out through ballot in the above general meeting of the Shareholders of the Bank.
3. After the election proceedings the following four candidates who secured highest number of votes polled were declared elected as Directors to the Central Board of the Bank, for a term of three years w.e.f. 26th June, 2017 to 25th June, 2020:
| Sr. No. | Name of the Director elected | Address |
| 1. | Shri Sanjiv Malhotra | 6, Motabhoy Mansion, Maharshi Karve Road, Churchgate, Mumbai – 400020 |
| 2. | Shri Pravin Hari Kutumbe | 703, Inder Towers, Kaka Saheb Gadgil Marg, Opp. Zandu Pharma, Prabha Devi, S O, Mumbai- 400025 |
| 3. | Shri Bhaskar Pramanik | 01PHE, Skycourt Laburnum Sushant Lok, Sector- 28, Gurgaon-122002 |
| 4. | Shri Basant Seth | Flat No 304, Kalpana Tower, 3/16, Vishnupuri, Kanpur-208002 |
Praveen Kumar Gupta, Managing Director
(Compliance & Risk)
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./114/17]
Corporate Centre,
State Bank Bhavan,
Madame Cama Road,
Mumbai – 400 021
Date: 16th June, 2017
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…