|
Change suggested by
(Name of Individual / Organisation)
|
|
|||
|
Address of the Individual/ Organisation
|
||||
|
Date
|
|
|||
|
Note
|
1. It is suggested that ONE Page may be used for one change.
2. This will enable us to group all the suggestions and take a decision on the changes suggested
|
|||
|
Page No
|
Point/ Para
|
Subject Matter
|
Comments/Suggestions
|
Rationale for the comments/ suggestions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…
Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…
Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…
Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…
Reassessment quashed as AO issued u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on incriminating material found during search…
Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/Cost Accountant/Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. has invited application for…