IRDAI

Revision in Premium Rates for Motor Third Party Insurance Covers for FY 2016-17 : IRDAI

Revision in Premium Rates for Motor Third Party Insurance Covers for FY 2016-17 : IRDAI
 
The Authority vide its order no. IRDA/NL/NTFN/MOTP/066/04/2011 dated 15th April 2011 notified that it would review and adjust the premium rates for motor third party insurance covers annually.
 
Accordingly, an exposure draft on the Revision in Premium Rates for Motor Third Party Insurance covers for the financial year 2016-17 is issued. The same is attached herewith. All stakeholders are requested to review the attached exposure draft and forward their views / comments in the prescribed format (MS Word format) to the undersigned by e-mail at suresh [at] irda [dot] gov [dot] in and a copy marked to nmbehera [at] irda [dot] gov [dot] in.
 
The comments/suggestions should reach the Authority by 20th March, 2016 in the format given below:
 
(Suresh Mathur)
Senior Joint Director
 
FORMAT FOR SUGGESTIONS ON
Exposure Draft on Revision in Premium Rates for Motor Third Party Insurance Covers for the Financial Year 2016-17

 

Change suggested by
(Name of Individual / Organisation)
 
Address of the Individual/ Organisation
Date
 
Note
1.     It is suggested that ONE Page may be used for one change.
2.    This will enable us to group all the suggestions and take a decision on the changes suggested
Page No
Point/ Para
Subject Matter
Comments/Suggestions
Rationale for the comments/ suggestions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Signature
 
Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago