Details of Investigation of Corporate Frauds by SFIO completed and prosecutions/petitions in Company Law Board filed during the period of last three years
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Press Release
08-03-2016
To investigate corporate frauds of serious and complex nature the Government has set up a Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). The SFIO established vide Government of India’s Resolution No. 45011/16/2003-Admn-I dated 02-07-2003, has been notified under sub-section (1) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 2013, vide Government of India, Gazette Notification S.O. 2005(E) dated 21.07.2015.
Details of investigations completed and prosecutions/petitions in Company Law Board filed (including in respect of investigations completed in earlier years) by SFIO during the period of last three years and the current year (up to 31-12-2015), are as under:
| Year | Number of investigations completed | Prosecutions filed |
| 2012-13 | 22 | 45 |
| 2013-14 | 22 | 89 |
| 2014-15 | 39 | 61 |
| 2015-16
(up to 31-12-2015) |
39 | 44 |
The nature of frauds detected involve:-
(i) Falsification of financial statements through inflated sales, overstatement of assets and understatement of liabilities;
(ii) Collection of deposits by companies under the guise of real estate, chit fund, etc. by alluring small investors with astronomical returns within short time without meeting the promises;
(iii) Fraudulent transactions;
(iv) Manipulation through related party transactions;
(v) Siphoning off and diversion of funds generated through various sources.
Government has taken a number of measures to curb and prevent corporate frauds, which include;
(i) Declaring ‘Fraud’ as a substantive offence has been introduced in the Companies Act, 2013.
(ii) Statutory status to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office has been granted under the Companies Act, 2013.
(iii) Stricter norms of Corporate Governance and their implementation under the Companies Act, 2013.
(iv) Increasing application of technology for early detection of frauds through data analysis, surveillance and usage of forensic tools, etc.
This was stated by Shri Arun Jaitley, Minister of Corporate Affairs in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha today.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…