Patents

Extension of the timelines/periods as prescribed under IP Acts

Extension of timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts/Rules towards completion of various acts/proceedings, falling due between lockdown period shall be 18th May 2020.
 
Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai
Govt. of India
 
PUBLIC NOTICE
 
(Ref: Notice dated 25/03/2020 and 15/04/2020)
 
Dated 4th May, 2020
 
Whereas this office has issued Public Notices regarding the timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications,falling due between the lockdown period, i.e. 25th March, 2020 to 3rd May, 2020, in accordance with section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
 
Whereas, the lockdown period has been extended to further period of two weeks, i.e. till 17th May, 2020 by GoI, MHA ORDER No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A) dated 1st May, 2020. Even though as per guidelines annexed with the order of MHA, the IP Offices are functional (with reduced strength), substantive limitations/restrictions on the movement of public and functioning of private offices in the Red Zones (Hotspots), are still in place.
 
Therefore, considering the fact that all the IP offices in India are located in Red Zones (Hotspots), the due dates, with respect to timelines/periods prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of any reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications filed with the offices under the administrative control of O/o CGPDTM, falling due between the above said lockdown period, shall be 18th May, 2020.
 
Sd/-
Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks
 
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

19 hours ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

2 days ago