Patents

Extension of the timelines/periods as prescribed under IP Acts

Extension of timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts/Rules towards completion of various acts/proceedings, falling due between lockdown period shall be 18th May 2020.
 
Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai
Govt. of India
 
PUBLIC NOTICE
 
(Ref: Notice dated 25/03/2020 and 15/04/2020)
 
Dated 4th May, 2020
 
Whereas this office has issued Public Notices regarding the timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications,falling due between the lockdown period, i.e. 25th March, 2020 to 3rd May, 2020, in accordance with section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
 
Whereas, the lockdown period has been extended to further period of two weeks, i.e. till 17th May, 2020 by GoI, MHA ORDER No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A) dated 1st May, 2020. Even though as per guidelines annexed with the order of MHA, the IP Offices are functional (with reduced strength), substantive limitations/restrictions on the movement of public and functioning of private offices in the Red Zones (Hotspots), are still in place.
 
Therefore, considering the fact that all the IP offices in India are located in Red Zones (Hotspots), the due dates, with respect to timelines/periods prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of any reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications filed with the offices under the administrative control of O/o CGPDTM, falling due between the above said lockdown period, shall be 18th May, 2020.
 
Sd/-
Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks
 
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation not an order for Revision u/s 264 of Income Tax Act

Section 143(1) Intimation is only an intimation and it cannot be treated as an order for the purpose of Section…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT with jurisdiction over non corporate assesee can’t transfer corporate assessee’s case

Order u/s 127 quashed as PCIT having jurisdiction over non corporate assesee could not have transferred case of a corporate…

3 hours ago
  • DGFT

Modalities for issue of export authorizations of wheat flour & related products

DGFT issues modalities for eligibility, receipt and processing of applications for issuance of authorizations for export of wheat flour and…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No obligation to deduct TDS u/s 195 on payment to non-resident foreign commission agent

No obligation to deduct tax at source u/s 195 on the commission paid to non-resident foreign commission agent not liable…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80P denied as return not filed u/s 139(1) but in response to notice u/s 148

Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…

2 days ago
  • GST

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…

2 days ago