Patents

Extension of the timelines/periods as prescribed under IP Acts

Extension of timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts/Rules towards completion of various acts/proceedings, falling due between lockdown period shall be 18th May 2020.
 
Office of CGPDTM, Mumbai
Govt. of India
 
PUBLIC NOTICE
 
(Ref: Notice dated 25/03/2020 and 15/04/2020)
 
Dated 4th May, 2020
 
Whereas this office has issued Public Notices regarding the timelines/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications,falling due between the lockdown period, i.e. 25th March, 2020 to 3rd May, 2020, in accordance with section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
 
Whereas, the lockdown period has been extended to further period of two weeks, i.e. till 17th May, 2020 by GoI, MHA ORDER No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A) dated 1st May, 2020. Even though as per guidelines annexed with the order of MHA, the IP Offices are functional (with reduced strength), substantive limitations/restrictions on the movement of public and functioning of private offices in the Red Zones (Hotspots), are still in place.
 
Therefore, considering the fact that all the IP offices in India are located in Red Zones (Hotspots), the due dates, with respect to timelines/periods prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules administered by the O/o CGPDTM towards completion of various acts/proceedings, filing of any reply/document, payment of fees, etc. in the matters of any IP applications filed with the offices under the administrative control of O/o CGPDTM, falling due between the above said lockdown period, shall be 18th May, 2020.
 
Sd/-
Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks
 
----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted In a recent judgment and order…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty set aside as Tax Audit Report not filed due to strained relationship with CA

ITAT set aside Penalty u/s 271B as Tax Audit Report was not filed due to strained relationship with CA In…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Unless request made, personal hearing not mandatory in faceless assessment – Patna HC

Unless request made, personal / oral hearing not mandatory and faceless assessment would be concluded without an oral hearing –…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Mere technical mistake in return cannot be a ground of disallowing a claim

Mere technical mistake made by assessee while filing up return cannot be a ground of disallowing the claim when such…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for land purchased in wife’s name SC stays HC Order

Denial of Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for agricultural land purchased in the name of wife Supreme Court stays High…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Surrounding circumstances, prudent investor behaviour key to creditworthiness

CIT(A) was justified in considering surrounding circumstances, the normal human conduct of a prudent investor, the probabilities to judge creditworthiness…

2 days ago