Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Change in area specified for trial of offence u/s 4

Court of Session designated as Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Amendment to area specified for trial of offence punishable u/s 4 in Bengaluru

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2021

S.O. 794(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), and in consultation with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the respective High Court, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), number S.O. 372(E), dated the 5thFebruary, 2016, namely:-

In the Table of the said notification, for serial no. 13 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:

S. No. State or Union territory Court of Session designated as Special Court under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 Area specified for trial of offence punishable under section 4 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
“13 Karnataka Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, ChitradurgaDistrict, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XLVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    III Additional District and Sessions Judge, District Court Complex, Bavutagude, Mangalore-31 Bagalkot District, Belgaum District, Bellary District, Bidar District, Bijapur District, Gadag District, Haveri District, Devanagare District, Dharwad District, Gulbarga District, U.K. Karwar District, Koppal District, Dakshin Kannada (Mangalore District), Udupi District”

F. No. C-18015/3/2013-Ad.ED (Part-I)]
VIVEK MISHRA, Under Secy

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago