Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Change in area specified for trial of offence u/s 4

Court of Session designated as Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Amendment to area specified for trial of offence punishable u/s 4 in Bengaluru

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2021

S.O. 794(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), and in consultation with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the respective High Court, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), number S.O. 372(E), dated the 5thFebruary, 2016, namely:-

In the Table of the said notification, for serial no. 13 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:

S. No. State or Union territory Court of Session designated as Special Court under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 Area specified for trial of offence punishable under section 4 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
“13 Karnataka Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, ChitradurgaDistrict, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XLVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    III Additional District and Sessions Judge, District Court Complex, Bavutagude, Mangalore-31 Bagalkot District, Belgaum District, Bellary District, Bidar District, Bijapur District, Gadag District, Haveri District, Devanagare District, Dharwad District, Gulbarga District, U.K. Karwar District, Koppal District, Dakshin Kannada (Mangalore District), Udupi District”

F. No. C-18015/3/2013-Ad.ED (Part-I)]
VIVEK MISHRA, Under Secy

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Not making available material forming basis of reopening shows AO had prejudged the issue

AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” was non-application of mind – High Court

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

HC declined to allow voluminous documents physically in Faceless Assessment

High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

4 days ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

5 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

5 days ago