Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Change in area specified for trial of offence u/s 4

Court of Session designated as Special Court under PMLA 2002 – Amendment to area specified for trial of offence punishable u/s 4 in Bengaluru

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2021

S.O. 794(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), and in consultation with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the respective High Court, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), number S.O. 372(E), dated the 5thFebruary, 2016, namely:-

In the Table of the said notification, for serial no. 13 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:

S. No. State or Union territory Court of Session designated as Special Court under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 Area specified for trial of offence punishable under section 4 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002
“13 Karnataka Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, ChitradurgaDistrict, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgir
    XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    XLVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Bengaluru City, Bengaluru Rural District, Tumkur District, Kolar District, Mandya District, Hassan District, Chikmagalur District, Chitradurga District, Mysore District, Chamarajanagar, Shimoga District, Kodagu-Madikeri Chikkaballapur, Ramanagara and Yadgiri
    III Additional District and Sessions Judge, District Court Complex, Bavutagude, Mangalore-31 Bagalkot District, Belgaum District, Bellary District, Bidar District, Bijapur District, Gadag District, Haveri District, Devanagare District, Dharwad District, Gulbarga District, U.K. Karwar District, Koppal District, Dakshin Kannada (Mangalore District), Udupi District”

F. No. C-18015/3/2013-Ad.ED (Part-I)]
VIVEK MISHRA, Under Secy

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Prevention of Corruption Act

CBDT Instruction can not absolve persons to explain source of gold within limits specified – SC

Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…

2 days ago
  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026. Last date 16.11.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT address some important issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA

ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Mere carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return – ITAT

Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Sales duly recorded in books & VAT returns, can’t be held bogus without cogent adverse material

Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows Diwali expenses incurred by assessee as business expenses

Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…

2 weeks ago