Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Proof of address of prisoner in a jail under PMLA Maintenance of Records Rules

Proof of address of individual prisoner in a jail – Amendment to PMLA Maintenance of Records Rules 

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 28th May, 2019

G.S.R. 381(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clauses (i), (jjj) and (k) of sub-section (2) of section 73 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, in rule 9, in sub-rule (5), in the proviso, in clause (i), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided that where the individual is a prisoner in a jail, the signature or thumb print shall be affixed in presence of the officer in-charge of the jail and the said officer shall certify the same under his signature and the account shall remain operational on annual submission of certificate of proof of address issued by the officer in-charge of the jail.”.

[F.No. P-12011/15/2018-ES Cell-DOR]

BIPLAB KUMAR NASKAR, Under Secy.

Note: The principal rules were published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (i) vide numbers G.S.R. 444 (E), dated the 1st July, 2005 and were last amended vide G.S.R. 108(E) dated 13th February, 2019.

Author’s Note:
Rule 9 of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 makes it mandatory for every banking company, financial institution etc. to verify records of the identity of the clients called “Client Due Diligence”.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago