Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 amended by RBI to cover insurance mutual fund sale and other third party investment products sold by banks
Reserve Bank of India
Date : Jun 24, 2017
The Reserve Bank of India has widened the scope of its Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006, to include, inter alia, deficiencies arising out of sale of insurance/ mutual fund/ other third party investment products by banks. Under the amended Scheme, a customer would also be able to lodge a complaint against the bank for its non-adherence to RBI instructions with regard to Mobile Banking/ Electronic Banking services in India.
The pecuniary jurisdiction of the Banking Ombudsman to pass an Award has been increased from existing rupees one million to rupees two million. Compensation not exceeding rupees hundred thousand can also be awarded by the Banking Ombudsman to the complainant for loss of time, expenses incurred as also, harassment and mental anguish suffered by the complainant.
The procedure for complaints settled by agreement under the Scheme has also been revised. Appeal has now been allowed for the complaints closed under Clause 13 (c) of the existing Scheme relating to rejection which was not available earlier.
The Reserve Bank has released a Notification dated June 16, 2017 amending the Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006. The amended Scheme shall come into force from July 1, 2017. The amended Scheme is available on the Reserve Bank’s website at https://www.rbi.org.in/commonman/English/Scripts/AgainstBank.aspx
Ajit Prasad
Assistant Adviser
Press Release : 2016-2017/3473
NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, (NERIST)…
Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) for Appointment of Internal Auditor Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) from reputed…
In a recent judgment Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional.…
Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…
No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…
Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…