RBI

Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 amended by RBI to cover insurance mutual fund/other third party investment products sold by banks

Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 amended by RBI to cover insurance mutual fund sale and other third party investment products sold by banks

Reserve Bank of India

Date : Jun 24, 2017

RBI amends Banking Ombudsman Scheme: Includes Complaints relating to Misselling and Mobile/ Electronic Banking

The Reserve Bank of India has widened the scope of its Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006, to include, inter alia, deficiencies arising out of sale of insurance/ mutual fund/ other third party investment products by banks. Under the amended Scheme, a customer would also be able to lodge a complaint against the bank for its non-adherence to RBI instructions with regard to Mobile Banking/ Electronic Banking services in India.

The pecuniary jurisdiction of the Banking Ombudsman to pass an Award has been increased from existing rupees one million to rupees two million. Compensation not exceeding rupees hundred thousand can also be awarded by the Banking Ombudsman to the complainant for loss of time, expenses incurred as also, harassment and mental anguish suffered by the complainant.

The procedure for complaints settled by agreement under the Scheme has also been revised. Appeal has now been allowed for the complaints closed under Clause 13 (c) of the existing Scheme relating to rejection which was not available earlier.

The Reserve Bank has released a Notification dated June 16, 2017 amending the Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006. The amended Scheme shall come into force from July 1, 2017. The amended Scheme is available on the Reserve Bank’s website at https://www.rbi.org.in/commonman/English/Scripts/AgainstBank.aspx

Ajit Prasad
Assistant Adviser

Press Release : 2016-2017/3473

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report by a CA from Tax Year 2026-27

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report from Tax Year 2026-27 Draft Form 26 has been issued…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

When no addition is made on the basis of reasons recorded, reopening is bad in law

When AO do not make any addition on the basis of the reasons on which the reopening was done, the…

8 hours ago
  • Insurance

No separate compensation for loss of love and affection under MV Act – SC

Under MV Act separate compensation can not be granted under the head “loss of love and affection” – Supreme Court…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Trust accredited by National Open School eligible for registration u/s 12AB & u/s 80G

Trust accredited by National Institute of Open Schooling eligible for registration u/s.12AB and u/s 80G of the Act. In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Covid Period to be excluded as per decision of Supreme Court

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Period between 15.03.2020 till 20.08.2022 to be excluded as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty in terms of section 273B

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty even if the assessee was able to show some reasonable cause…

3 days ago