RBI

Banks not to grant approval to foreign Law firms for practicing in India – RBI

Banks not to grant approval to any branch office, project office, liaison office to foreign Law firms for practicing in India

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2018 held that advocates enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961 alone are entitled to practice law in India and that foreign law firms/companies or foreign lawyers cannot practice profession of law in India.

As a result, foreign law firms/companies or foreign lawyers or any other person resident outside India, are not permitted to establish any branch office, project office, liaison office or other place of business in India for the purpose of practicing legal profession.

Earlier, during the pendency of the interim order of the Apex Court, the RBI had advised the banks that no fresh permissions/ renewal of permission shall be granted by the Reserve Bank/AD Category-I banks to any foreign law firm for opening of Liaison Office in India, till the policy is reviewed based on final disposal of the matter by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

RBI forbids Banks to grant approval to foreign Law firms to practice law in India

Accordingly, RBI has now advised banks not to grant any approval to any branch office, project office, liaison office or other place of business in India under FEMA for the purpose of practicing legal profession in India.

The Banks are required to bring to the notice of the Reserve Bank of any case of violation of the provisions of the Advocates Act coming to their notice.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

Engagement of ‘Young Professional’ in the office of the PCCT Bihar & Jharkhand

Engagement of 'Young Professional' in the office of the PCCT Bihar & Jharkhand Engagement of 'Young Professional' in the office…

1 hour ago
  • Empanelment

CGPDTM invites applications for hiring contractual manpower and Young Professionals

CGPDTM invites applications for hiring contractual manpower and Young Professionals The Controller General Patents, Designs & Trade Marks has invited…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

12 hours ago