Customer due diligence for re-activation of dormant bank accounts. Ensuring genuineness of transaction, verification of signature and identity – RBI
Reserve Bank of India
Requirement of customer due diligence and need for maintenance of records
RBI/2016-17/173
DBR.AML.BC.No.44/14.01.001/2016-17
December 06, 2016
All Regulated Entities (REs)
Dear Sir/Madam,
Requirement of customer due diligence and need for maintenance of records
It has been reported that, of late, a lot of customers are approaching banks for re-activation of dormant accounts.
2. In this regard, we invite attention to paragraph 24.2 (ix) of the Master Circular on ‘Customer Services in Banks’ dated July 1, 2015, requiring that operation in dormant accounts with banks may be allowed after due diligence as per risk category of the customer. As stated therein, ‘due diligence’ would mean ensuring genuineness of the transaction, verification of the signature and identity etc.
3. Attention is also invited to Chapters VI and VII of our Master Direction on KYC dated February 25, 2016, addressed to all Regulated Entities (REs) in terms of which
4. It is reiterated that REs shall ensure compliance, inter alia, with the above mentioned instructions as applicable on activation of dormant accounts, customer due diligence and record management, scrupulously.
(S.S.Barik)
Chief General Manager – in – Charge
AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…
FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied. The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…
Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…