RBI

RBI extends coverage of NBFC Ombudsman Scheme to eligible Non Deposit Taking NBFC

RBI extends coverage of NBFC Ombudsman Scheme to eligible Non Deposit Taking NBFC

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has extended the coverage of Ombudsman Scheme for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), 2018 (the Scheme) to eligible Non Deposit Taking Non Banking Financial Companies (NBFC-NDs) having asset size of Rupees 100 crore or above with customer interface. 

The extension of the Scheme to eligible Non-Deposit Accepting Non-Banking Financial Companies shall come into effect and force from April 26, 2019.

However, the following types of NBFCs are excluded from the ambit of the Scheme:

(i) The Non Banking Financial Company-Infrastructure Finance Company (NBFC-IFC),

(ii) Core Investment Company (CIC),

(iii) Infrastructure Debt Fund-Non-banking Financial Company (IDF-NBFC) and

(iv) NBFC under liquidation,

The the Ombudsman Scheme for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) was launched on February 23, 2018 for redressal of complaints against NBFCs registered with RBI under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934 and covered all deposit accepting NBFCs to begin with.

The Scheme provides a cost-free and expeditious complaint redressal mechanism relating to deficiency in the services by NBFCs covered under the Scheme.

The offices of the NBFC Ombudsmen are functioning at four metro centres viz. Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai and New Delhi and handle complaints of customers in the respective zones.

The Scheme also provides for an Appellate mechanism under which the complainant / NBFC has the option to appeal against the decision of the Ombudsman before the Appellate Authority.

The complete Scheme is available on RBI’s website.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report by a CA from Tax Year 2026-27

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report from Tax Year 2026-27 Draft Form 26 has been issued…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

When no addition is made on the basis of reasons recorded, reopening is bad in law

When AO do not make any addition on the basis of the reasons on which the reopening was done, the…

7 hours ago
  • Insurance

No separate compensation for loss of love and affection under MV Act – SC

Under MV Act separate compensation can not be granted under the head “loss of love and affection” – Supreme Court…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Trust accredited by National Open School eligible for registration u/s 12AB & u/s 80G

Trust accredited by National Institute of Open Schooling eligible for registration u/s.12AB and u/s 80G of the Act. In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Covid Period to be excluded as per decision of Supreme Court

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Period between 15.03.2020 till 20.08.2022 to be excluded as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty in terms of section 273B

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty even if the assessee was able to show some reasonable cause…

3 days ago