RBI

RBI framework for Turn Around Time & customer compensation for failed transactions

RBI framework for Turn Around Time (TAT) and customer compensation for failed transactions using authorised Payment Systems

Monetary Policy statement of RBI dated April 4, 2019 proposed that the Reserve Bank would put in place a framework on Turn Around Time (TAT) for resolution of customer complaints and compensation framework across all authorised payment system

The RBI has stated that as observed, a large number of customer complaints emanate on account of unsuccessful or ‘failed’ transactions which could be on account of various factors not directly attributable to the customer such as disruption of communication links, non-availability of cash in ATMs, time-out of sessions, non-credit to beneficiary’s account due to various causes, etc. However, the rectification / Compensation paid to the customer for these ‘failed’ transactions is not uniform.

Accordingly, the Bank has finalised the framework for TAT for failed transactions and compensation to boost customer confidence and bring in uniformity in processing of the failed transactions.

The revised framework shall come into effect from October 15, 2019

It has been clarified that :

  • the prescribed TAT is the outer limit for resolution of failed transactions; and

  • the banks and other operators / system participants shall endeavour towards quicker resolution of such failed transactions.

Also  Wherever financial compensation is involved, the same shall be effected to the customer’s account suo moto, without waiting for a complaint or claim from the customer.

Customers who do not get the benefit of redress of the failure as defined in the TAT, can register a complaint to the Banking Ombudsman of Reserve Bank of India.

RBI framework for Turn Around Time (TAT) and customer compensation for failed transactions using authorised Payment Systems:

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

If assessee fails to explain source of purchases, estimating profit rate contrary to Section 69C

When assessee failed to explain source of purchases expenditure, estimating profit rate was contrary to provision of Section 69C which…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD for delay

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD on adopting a long process resulting delay…

6 hours ago
  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

1 day ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

1 day ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

2 days ago