RBI
RBI opens third office of the Ombudsman at New Delhi
As announced in the Monetary Policy Statement of December 5, 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had launched the Ombudsman Scheme for Digital Transactions (OSDT) on January 31, 2019.
The Reserve Bank has set up a third office of the Banking Ombudsman (BO) and Ombudsman for Digital Transactions (ODT) at Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi (New Delhi-III) with a view to meet the growing demand for resolution under the Banking Ombudsman Scheme and the OSDT.
This office will be operational with effect from July 1, 2019.
The territorial jurisdiction and e-mail ids of BO and ODT New Delhi I, II and III with effect from July 1, 2019 would be as under:
| SN | BO/ ODT | Territorial Jurisdiction | Email ID |
| 1 | New Delhi I | North, North-West, West, South-West, New Delhi and South districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 2 | New Delhi II | Haryana (except Panchkula, Yamuna Nagar and Ambala Districts) and Ghaziabad and Gautam Budh Nagar districts of Uttar Pradesh | bonewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 3 | New Delhi III | North-East, Central, Shahdara, East and South-East districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
The territorial jurisdiction under the Ombudsman Scheme for Non-Banking Financial Companies remains unchanged.
Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…
NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets. NALCO has invited Request…
Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…
Entire manufacturing process though by distinct units relevant for exemption from excise duty on account of manufacture without aid of…
High Court condoned delay in filing Form 10B as the failure was in the 1st Year of operation of the…
Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…