RBI
RBI opens third office of the Ombudsman at New Delhi
As announced in the Monetary Policy Statement of December 5, 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had launched the Ombudsman Scheme for Digital Transactions (OSDT) on January 31, 2019.
The Reserve Bank has set up a third office of the Banking Ombudsman (BO) and Ombudsman for Digital Transactions (ODT) at Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi (New Delhi-III) with a view to meet the growing demand for resolution under the Banking Ombudsman Scheme and the OSDT.
This office will be operational with effect from July 1, 2019.
The territorial jurisdiction and e-mail ids of BO and ODT New Delhi I, II and III with effect from July 1, 2019 would be as under:
| SN | BO/ ODT | Territorial Jurisdiction | Email ID |
| 1 | New Delhi I | North, North-West, West, South-West, New Delhi and South districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 2 | New Delhi II | Haryana (except Panchkula, Yamuna Nagar and Ambala Districts) and Ghaziabad and Gautam Budh Nagar districts of Uttar Pradesh | bonewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 3 | New Delhi III | North-East, Central, Shahdara, East and South-East districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
The territorial jurisdiction under the Ombudsman Scheme for Non-Banking Financial Companies remains unchanged.
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…
Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…