RBI
RBI opens third office of the Ombudsman at New Delhi
As announced in the Monetary Policy Statement of December 5, 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had launched the Ombudsman Scheme for Digital Transactions (OSDT) on January 31, 2019.
The Reserve Bank has set up a third office of the Banking Ombudsman (BO) and Ombudsman for Digital Transactions (ODT) at Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi (New Delhi-III) with a view to meet the growing demand for resolution under the Banking Ombudsman Scheme and the OSDT.
This office will be operational with effect from July 1, 2019.
The territorial jurisdiction and e-mail ids of BO and ODT New Delhi I, II and III with effect from July 1, 2019 would be as under:
| SN | BO/ ODT | Territorial Jurisdiction | Email ID |
| 1 | New Delhi I | North, North-West, West, South-West, New Delhi and South districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi1@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 2 | New Delhi II | Haryana (except Panchkula, Yamuna Nagar and Ambala Districts) and Ghaziabad and Gautam Budh Nagar districts of Uttar Pradesh | bonewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi2@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
| 3 | New Delhi III | North-East, Central, Shahdara, East and South-East districts of Delhi | bonewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for BO) odtnewdelhi3@rbi.org.in (for ODT) |
The territorial jurisdiction under the Ombudsman Scheme for Non-Banking Financial Companies remains unchanged.
After notice u/s 143(2) is issued in scrutiny proceedings, summary processing u/s 143(1) is not permissible - ITAT In a…
Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that…
Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…
Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…
State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…
Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…