RBI

RBI tweaks conditions of disclosure of divergence in the asset classification & provisioning by banks

RBI specify threshold percentage for disclosure of divergence in asset classification & provisioning by banks with additional provisioning assessed by RBI 

The RBI vide Notification dated 18.04.2018 mandated disclosures by banks on divergences from prudential norms on income recognition, asset classification and provisioning exceed certain thresholds.

It had been stated that banks shall make suitable disclosures wherever: 

(a) the additional provisioning requirements assessed by RBI exceed 15 percent of the published net profits after tax for the reference period or

(b) the additional Gross NPAs identified by RBI exceed 15 percent of the published incremental Gross NPAs1 for the reference period, or both.

RBI has observed that in view of the above, some banks, on account of low or negative net profit after tax, are required to disclose divergences even where the additional provisioning assessed by RBI is small, which is contrary to the regulatory intent that only material divergences should be disclosed.

Therefore, now it has been stated that henceforth, banks should disclose divergences, if either or both of the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. the additional provisioning for NPAs assessed by RBI exceeds 10 per cent of the reported profit before provisions and contingencies for the reference period, and

  2. the additional Gross NPAs identified by RBI exceed 15 per cent of the published incremental Gross NPAs for the reference period.

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025

Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…

7 hours ago
  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

4 days ago