RBI

Relaxation on the guidelines to NBFCs on securitisation transactions by RBI

Relaxation on the guidelines to NBFCs on securitisation transactions

In order to encourage NBFCs to securitise/assign their eligible assets, RBI has decided to relax the Minimum Holding Period (MHP) requirement for originating NBFCs, in respect of loans of original maturity above 5 years, to receipt of repayment of six monthly instalments or two quarterly instalments (as applicable), subject to the following prudential requirement:

Minimum Retention Requirement (MRR) for such securitisation/assignment transactions shall be 20% of the book value of the loans being securitised/20% of the cash flows from the assets assigned.

RBI in a circular issued on 29th Nov, 2018 has clarified that the above dispensation shall be applicable to securitisation/assignment transactions carried out during a period of six months from the date of issuance of the circular.

Other terms and conditions of the Master Directions on Non-Banking Financial Company – Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions dated September 01, 2016 and paragraph 89 of Non-Banking Financial Company –Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions dated September 01, 2016 would continue to apply

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Income Tax Rules 2026 notified by CBDT

Income Tax Rules 2026 notified by CBDT. CBDT has issued Notification No. 22/2026 dated 20.03.2026 to notify the Income-tax Rules,…

20 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Absence of irrevocability clause no ground for rejecting registration u/s 12AB

Absence of an explicit irrevocability clause in trust deed no ground for rejecting application for registration or renewal under section…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago