Submission of SFT-AIR for issue of Savings Bond of Rs 5 lakh or more u/s 285-BA of Income Tax Act 1961- RBI advisory to Banks
Reserve Bank of India
RBI/2016-17/309
IDMD.CDD.No.3031/13.01.299/2016-17
May 25, 2017
The Chairman/ Managing Director
State Bank of India/Associate Banks/
17 Nationalised Banks/
UTI Bank Ltd., ICICI Bank Ltd.,
HDFC Bank Ltd., IDBI Bank Ltd./
Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd.
Dear Sir/Madam
Submission of Annual Information Return relating to issue of Bonds for ₹ 5 lakh or more under Section 285 BA of Income Tax Act, 1961-Change thereof
Please refer to letter DGBA.CDD.13.01.299/H – 739 – 768/2005-06 dated August 5, 2005 on the captioned subject.
2. You have been authorized to issue Savings Bonds Notified by the Government of India on behalf of Reserve Bank of India. In this connection, you may be aware that the offices accepting deposits under these schemes are required to furnish Annual Information Return as contemplated in Section 285 BA of the Income Tax Act, 1961read with Rule 114E of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 to the concerned Income Tax Authorities before the due date i.e., August 31 of the year if the aggregate of the amount received from a person is ₹ 5 lakh or more in a year. In terms of Section 2 (31) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a person has been defined to include (i) an individual, (ii) a Hindu undivided family, (iii) a company, (iv) a firm, (v) an association of person or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, (vi) a local authority, and (vii) every artificial juridical person, not falling with any of the preceding sub-clauses.
3. In this connection, we advise that Income Tax Department has brought about the undermentioned changes in the AIR (copy enclosed)
4. In view of the above, please submit the Statement of Financial Transaction to the Tax Authorities in respect of your bank/corporation as per the revised statement and procedure.
Yours faithfully,
(Shyni Sunil)
Deputy General Manager
Encls: as above
ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…