SEBI

SEBI e-payment facility for payment of penalties disgorgement settlement legal charges and recovery. Bank account RTGS details

PR No. 131/2016

SEBI introduces e-payment facility for payment of penalties, disgorgement amounts, etc.

In order to enable ease of paying penalties, disgorgement amounts, settlement amounts, legal charges and recovery amounts, SEBI is introducing an option for e-payment of such amounts. Such payments may be remitted to the SEBI accounts detailed below:

Account No. for remittance of penalties levied by Adjudication Officer
Bank Name State Bank of India
Branch  Bandra-Kurla Complex
RTGS Code  SBIN0004380
Beneficiary  Name    SEBI – Penalties Remittable To Government of  India
Beneficiary A/c No. 31465271959
Account No. for remittance of Settlement Amounts and Legal Charges/Recovery Amounts
Bank Name Bank of India,
Branch  Bandra-Kurla Complex
RTGS Code  BKID 0000122
Beneficiary  Name    Securities and Exchange Board of India
Beneficiary A/c No. 012210210000007
Account No. for remittance of Disgorgement Amounts
Bank Name Bank of India,
Branch  Bandra-Kurla Complex
RTGS Code  BKID 0000122
Beneficiary  Name    Securities and Exchange Board of India
Beneficiary A/c No. 012210210000008(for orders under Section 11B of SEBI Act)

012210210000007(for orders under Section 12A of the SCR Act and 19A of Depositories Act)

All payees are advised to henceforth, forward the details and confirmation of the payments so made, to the concerned dealing department of SEBI for their records as per the format provided at Annexure A.

Mumbai
August 09, 2016

 Annexure A
Format for forwarding details and confirmations of e-payments made to SEBI

1. Case Name :

2. Name of Payee:

3. Date of payment:

4. Amount Paid:

5.Transaction No:

6. Bank Details in which payment is made:

7. Payment is made for: (like penalties/disgorgement/recovery/Settlement amount and legal charges along with order details)

August 09, 2016

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

3 days ago