SEBI

Grievance Resolution between listed entities and proxy advisers

Grievance Resolution between listed entities and proxy advisers. Listed entities may approach SEBI to examine non-compliance with Code of Conduct

Securities and Exchange Board of India

CIRCULAR

SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD1/CIR/P/2020/119

August 04, 2020

All listed entities that have listed their specified securities
All Recognized Stock Exchanges

Madam / Sir,

Subject: Grievance Resolution between listed entities and proxy advisers

1. Regulation 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (‘LODR’) casts certain obligations on listed entities to protect and facilitate the exercise of the rights of shareholders, including:

a. right to participate in, and to be sufficiently informed of, decisions concerning fundamental corporate changes,

b. opportunity to participate effectively and vote in general shareholder meetings,

c. effective shareholder participation in key corporate governance decisions, such as the nomination and election of members of board of directors and

d. exercise of ownership rights by all shareholders, including institutional investors.

2. Proxy advisors, over the past few years, have played a key role in enabling shareholders to effectively participate in corporate governance decisions and thus, furthering the achievement of the above objectives. Proxy advisors provide advice to institutional investors /shareholders of a listed entity, in relation to exercise of their rights in the company including voting recommendation on agenda items. However, due to the inherent nature of the work, it is probable that proxy advisors and listed entities may have different views on any agenda item of the listed entity leading to grievances.

3. In order to facilitate resolution of such grievances of listed entities against SEBI registered proxy advisors, the listed entities may approach SEBI. SEBI will examine the matter for non-compliance by proxy advisors with the provisions of the Code of Conduct under regulation 24(2) read with regulation 23(1) of the SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations, 2014 and the procedural guidelines for proxy advisors issued vide SEBI circular no. SEBI/HO/IMD/DF1/CIR/P/2020/147 dated August 03, 2020.

4. The provisions of this Circular shall be applicable with effect from September 01, 2020.

5. This Circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Regulation 101 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

6. This Circular is available at www.sebi.gov.inunder the link “LegalCirculars”.The recognized stock exchanges are advised to disseminate the contents of this Circular on their website.

Pradeep Ramakrishnan
General Manager
Corporation Finance
Department Compliance and Monitoring Division-1
+91-22-26449246
pradeepr@sebi.gov.in

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago