SEBI

Measures to strengthen the conduct of Investment Advisers (IA) – SEBI Circular

Measures to strengthen the conduct of Investment Advisers (IA) – SEBI Circular

Securities and Exchange Board of India

CIRCULAR

SEBI/HO/IMD/DF1/CIR/P/2019/169                                                                          December 27, 2019

All Investment Advisers

Sir/Madam,

Subject: Measures to strengthen the conduct of Investment Advisers (IA)

1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (IA Regulations) provides for code of conduct to be followed by IAs. In order to further strengthen the conduct of IAs, while providing investment advice and to protect the interest of investors seeking their advice, the IAs shall comply with the following:

(i)  Restriction  on tree trial

As per SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, investment advice can be given after completing risk profiling of the client and ensuring suitability of the product. It has come to the notice that lAs are providing advice on free trial basis without considering risk profile of the client. Hence the lAs shall not provide free trial for any products/services to prospective clients. Further, lAs shall not accept part payments (where some part of the fee is paid in advance) for any product/service.

(ii) Proper risk profiling and consent of client on risk profiling

Risk profiling of the client is essential to provide advice on suitable product based on various criteria like income, age, securities market experience etc. RIAs shall provide abcaus.in investment advice only after completing the following steps:

a. Complete the risk profile of the client based on information provided by the client

b. Obtain consent of the client on completed risk profile either through registered email or physical document

(iii) Receiving tees though bonking channel only

It is observed that investment advisers are receiving advisory fee in the form of cash deposit in their bank accounts or through payment gateways which does not provide proper audit trail of fees received from the clients. To bring transparency in dealing with the clients, IAs shall accept fees strictly by account payee crossed cheques / demand draft or by way of direct credit into their bank account through NEFT/ RTGS/IMPS/UP I. It is clarified that, IAs shall not accept cash deposits.

(iv) Display of complaints status on website

In order to bring more transparency and enable the investors to take informed decision regarding availing of advisory services, lAs shall display the following information on the homepage (without scrolling) of their website/mobile app. The information should be displayed properly using font size of 12 or above and made available on monthly basis (within 7 days of end of the previous month):

Number of complaints

At the beginning of the month

Received during the month

Resolved during the month

Pending at the end  of the month

Reasons for pendency

2. The measures as referred above shall come into effect from January 01, 2020.

3. This circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act,1992, to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market.

Yours faithfully,

Naveen Sharma
General Manager
022-26449709
Email:  naveens@sebi.gov.in

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

17 hours ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

4 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

1 week ago