SEBI

Mutual fund schemes investing in exchange traded commodity derivative-SEBI Guidelines

Mutual fund schemes investing in exchange traded commodity derivative may hold underlying goods in physical settlement of contracts or appoint a custodian

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

NOTIFICATION

Mumbai, the 26th April,, 2019

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) (Amendment) Regulations, 2019

No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2019/011.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 30 read with clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 11 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board hereby makes the following regulations to further amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, namely –

1. These Regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) (Amendment) Regulations, 2019.

2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

3. In the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, –

I. in regulation 2, –

i. after clause (mc) and before clause (mm), the following clause shall be inserted, namely, –

“(md) “goods” means the goods notified by the Central Government under clause (bc) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and forming the underlying
of any commodity derivative;”

ii. in clause (q), the following second proviso shall be inserted after the first proviso, namely,-

“Provided further that mutual fund schemes investing in exchange traded commodity derivatives may hold the underlying goods in case of physical settlement of such contracts.”

II. in regulation 7, in clause (g), after the word “securities” and before the word “or”, the words “or goods” shall be inserted;

III. in regulation 26, in sub-regulation (1), the following proviso shall be inserted after the second proviso, namely,-

“Provided also that mutual fund schemes investing in exchange traded commodity derivatives may appoint a custodian to have custody of the underlying goods in case of physical settlement of such contracts.”

IV. in regulation 44, in the proviso to sub-regulation (1), after the word “Schedule” and before the word “shall”, the following words, symbols and numbers shall be inserted, namely,-

“, save clause 14 therein,”

V. in regulation 52, in sub-regulation (4), in clause (b), after sub-clause (xiid) and before sub-clause (xiii), the following sub-clause shall be inserted, namely, –

“(xiie) in case of schemes investing in exchange traded commodity derivatives, recurring expenses incurred towards storage and handling abcaus.in of the underlying goods, due to physical
settlement of such contracts.”

VI. in the Seventh Schedule, after clause 13 the following clause shall be inserted, namely,-

“14. A mutual fund scheme may invest in exchange traded commodity derivatives subject to such investment restrictions as may be specified by the Board from time to time.”

AJAY TYAGI, Chairman
[ADVT-III/4/Exty./22/19]

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

2 days ago