SEBI

SEBI modifies penalty provisions for non/short collection of upfront margins in cash segment

SEBI modifies penalty provisions for non/short collection of upfront margins in cash segment

Securities and Exchange Board of India

CIRCULAR

SEBI/HO/MIRSD/DOP/CIR/P/2020/146

July 31, 2020

To,
All Recognised Stock Exchanges
All Recognised Clearing Corporations

Dear Sir/Madam,

Subject: Collection and Reporting of Margins by Trading Member (TM) /Clearing Member (CM) in Cash Segment

1. SEBI, vide circular no. CIR/HO/MIRSD/DOP/CIR/P/2019/139 dated November 19, 2019, issued guidelines with regard to collection of margins from clients and reporting of short-collection/non-collection of margins by Trading Member (TM) / Clearing Member (CM).

2. In view of the representations received from investors, TMs/ CMs, stock broker associations, in this regard, following has been decided:

2.1. If TM / CM collects minimum 20% upfront margin in lieu of VaR and ELM from the client, then penalty for short-collection / non-collection of margin shall not be applicable. However, it is reiterated that Clearing Corporation shall continue to collect the upfront margin from the TM / CM based on VaR and ELM.

2.2. The penalty provision for short-collection / non-collection of upfront margin in cash segment shall be implemented with effect from September 01, 2020.

3. SEBI circular dated November 19, 2019 is modified to the extent of the above. All other provisions of the said circular dated November 19, 2019 shall continue to remain applicable.

4. This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.

Yours faithfully

Narendra Rawat
General Manager
Market Intermediaries Regulation and Supervision Department

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Information in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, can’t be said to belong to assessee

When information contained in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, there is absolutely no room for presumption that it belongs…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Setting aside remand order of CIT(A) without interfering with direction to delete addition, did not revive AO’s order

When CIT(A) order to remand case to AO was set aside without interfering with direction to delete addition, order of…

21 hours ago
  • arbitration

Whether Arbitral Tribunal can grant a prohibited claim in a contract – Larger Bench to decide

Whether a prohibited claim in a contract applies only to the employer and not to the Arbitral Tribunal – Matter…

2 days ago
  • contract-law

Court can examine contractual employee termination on sole ground of ineligibility

Where a contractual employee is terminated on the sole ground of ineligibility, the Court is entitled to examine its correctness…

2 days ago
  • EPFO

Upon deceased acquiring family, as specified earlier GPF nomination became invalid – SC

Upon deceased acquiring family, GPF nomination in favour of mother became invalid and in absence of fresh nomination, mother and…

2 days ago
  • GST

Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details

GSTN Advisory on Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details as per Rule 10A As…

2 days ago