SEBI

SEBI mandates certification requirement for principal officer/employees of Portfolio Managers

SEBI mandates certification for principal officer/employees of Portfolio Managers having decision making authority related to fund management

As per the notification No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2021/49 issued the following is prescribed:

Certification requirement for Portfolio Managers 

1. The associated persons functioning as principal officer of a Portfolio Manager or employee(s) of the Portfolio Manager having decision making authority related to fund management, shall obtain certification from the National Institute of Securities Markets by passing the NISM-Series-XXI-B: Portfolio Managers Certification Examination as mentioned in the communiqué No. NISM/Certification/Series-XXI-B: Portfolio Managers (PM) Certification/2021/01 dated June 15, 2021 issued by the National Institute of Securities Markets.

2. The Portfolio Managers shall ensure that all such associated persons who are principal officers or employees having decision making authority related to fund management as on the date of this notification obtain the certification by passing the NISM-Series-XXI-B: Portfolio Managers Certification Examination within two years from the date of this notification:

Provided that a Portfolio Manager, who engages or employs any such associated person who is a principal officer or an employee having decision making authority related to fund management, after the date of this notification, shall ensure that such person obtains certification by passing the NISM-Series-XXI-B: Portfolio Managers Certification Examination within one year from the date of their employment.

Download SEBI Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

20 hours ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Unless medical certificate are held forged & fictitious, appeal can’t be rejected on ground of delay

Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…

4 days ago
  • DGFT

One Star Export House status allowed based on export performance in two FYs

FTP 2023 amended to allow One Star Export House status to applicants (other than for Gems & Jewelry Sector) based…

5 days ago