SEBI is empowering Investors through Investor Charters for Securities Market
SEBI is empowering Investors through Investor Charters. In order to further augment its efforts to protect investors’ interests, promote transparency in markets and enhance awareness, trust and confidence among the investors, SEBI, vide a Public Notice dated November 17, 2021, had published the “Investor Charter” for securities markets.
SEBI has issued a Press Release highlighting various steps been taken to implement the Investor Charter. As per the release, separate Investor Charters regarding investor related activities of various intermediaries have been developed by SEBI in consultation with the respective entities.
These separate Investor Charters have been developed for stock exchanges, depositories, SEBI registered intermediaries and regulated entities including Stock Brokers, depository participants, Asset Management companies, Registrar and Transfer Agents, Investment Advisers, Research Analysts, Merchant Bankers, etc. Stock Exchanges, Depositories and various intermediaries have since published the respective charters on their websites.
The Investor Charters of SEBI registered institutions and intermediaries, contain information related to details of various services provided by the intermediaries to investors, their timelines, importance of preservation of relevant documents by the investors, investor grievance redressal mechanism, etc. These charters are expected to help investors to improve their ease of investing in Indian securities market.
According to SEBI, as for its own charter, efforts have been taken to enhance the effectiveness of investor grievance redressal mechanism. SEBI has been publishing the status of disposal P a g e2| 2of investor grievances received in SCORES (SEBI Complaints Redress System) on its website on a monthly basis. Details of investor grievances, which are pending for more than three months with different intermediaries, are also being published. In case SEBI receives a large number of/repeated complaints on any issue, the root causes are analyzed and if required, appropriate policy changes are made to address the issue.
For instance, some of the recent policy initiatives taken by SEBI, after conducting such an analysis, include the following:
(a) Amendments pertaining to the Investor Protection Fund (IPF)/ Investor Service Fund (ISF) and its related matters, inter-alia, to expand the scope of dispute resolution.
(b) The norms for processing of investor services requests by the RTAs have been standardized and simplified and common norms have been introduced for registering/ change in details like PAN,KYC and nominee and also for other services involving securities certificate.
(c) Providing for an electronic interface for processing investor’s queries, complaints and service requests by RTAs.
(d) All holders of physical securities in listed companies are now required to mandatorily furnish their PAN, KYC details including bank account details so as to preempt grievance pertaining to non-receipt of payments and intimation / notification from the company.
(e) All holders of physical securities in listed companies are now required to mandatorily furnish their nomination (or file declaration to opt out) to preempt grievance pertaining to transmission. SEBI is also examining, in consultation with regulated entities, the possibility of introducing alternate dispute resolution mechanism in various agreements(wherever possible)between the regulated entities and their clients.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…