Service Tax

Aggregator and Goods Transportation-Service Tax Rule 2 Amendment

Aggregator and Goods Transportation-Service Tax Rule 2 Amendment 

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)

NOTIFICATION No. 2/2017-Service Tax

New Delhi, the 12th January, 2017

G.S.R…. (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), read with sub-section (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994,namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2017.
    (2) They shall come into force on the 22nd day of January, 2017.

2. In the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in rule 2, in sub-rule (1),‑

(i) in clause (aa), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided that aggregator shall not include such person who enables a potential customer to connect with persons providing services by way of renting of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes subject to following conditions, namely:-

(a) the person providing services by way of renting of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes has a service tax registration under provision of these rules; and

(b) whole of the consideration for services provided by such service provider is received directly by such service provider and no amount, which forms part of the consideration of services of such service provider, is received by the aggregator directly from either recipient of the service or his representative.”;

 (ii) in clause (d), in sub-clause(i), after item (EEB), the following item shall be inserted, namely:-

“(EEC) in relation to services provided or agreed to be provided by a person located in non-taxable territory to a person located in non-taxable territory by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India, the person in India who complies with sections 29, 30 or 38 read with section 148 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) with respect to such goods;”.

[F. No. 354/42/2016-TRU]

(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Note:- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide notification No. 2/94-Service Tax, dated the 28th June, 1994 vide number G.S.R. 546 (E), dated the 28th June, 1994 and last amended vide notification No. 53/2016-Service Tax, dated the 19th December, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 1155 (E), dated the 19th December, 2016.

– See more at: http://taxguru.in/service-tax/amendment-definition-aggregator-peron-liable-tax-goods-transport-vesssel.html#sthash.nccQ1quD.dpuf

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 on instance of Assessing Officer

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act upon a proposal from the Assessing Officer…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t disturb income returned by assessee, without issue of notice u/s 143(2) – ITAT

If AO intends to disturb income returned by assessee, it is mandatory on his part to issue notice under section…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Source of cash being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat is plausible

Source of cash deposit being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat was held plausible and addition u/s…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CPC was not justified in making the disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for non deduction of TDS

TDS deductibility being debatable issue and not an apparent incorrect claim, CPC was not justified in making the disallowance In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books

No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…

2 days ago
  • arbitration

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago