Service Tax

Service Tax on Senior Advocates on representational services before any court, tribunal, etc. directly-indirectly to business entity. Notification 34/2016

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)

NOTIFICATION No. 34/2016-Service Tax

New Delhi, the 6th June, 2016

G.S.R.____(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 30/2012-Service Tax, dated the 20th June, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 472 (E), dated the 20th June, 2012, namely:-

1. In the said notification,-

(a) in paragraph I, in clause (A),-

(i) in sub-clause (iv), for item (B), the following item shall be substituted, namely:-

“(B) an individual advocate or a firm of advocates by way of legal services other than representational services by senior advocates, or”;

(ii) for sub-clause (iva), the following sub-clauses shall be substituted, namely:-

“(iva) provided or agreed to be provided by a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, and the senior advocate is providing such services, to such business entity who is litigant, applicant, or petitioner, as the case may be”;

(ivb) provided or agreed to be provided by a director of a company or a body corporate to the said company or the body corporate;”

(b) in paragraph (II):-

(i) in the TABLE, against Sl. No. 5, for the entry under column (2), the following entry shall be substituted, namely:-

“in respect of services provided or agreed to be provided by an individual advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services, directly or indirectly”;

(ii) after Explanation II., the following shall be inserted, namely:-

“Explanation III. – The business entity located in the taxable territory who is litigant, applicant or petitioner, as the case may be, shall be treated as the person who receives the legal services for the purpose of this notification.”.

[F.No. B-1/7/2016-TRU]

(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary

Note:-The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 30/2012 – Service Tax, dated the 20 thJune, 2012, vide number G.S.R. 472 (E), dated the 20thJune, 2012 and last amended vide notification No. 18/2016-Service Tax, dated the 1 st March, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 266, dated the 1 st March, 2016

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

Agreement validly terminated prior to CIRP not give any enforceable right to corporate debtor

Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…

13 hours ago
  • negotiable instrument act

SC explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques

Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Normal business advances adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act

Advances received in normal course of business and adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of the Income…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Faceless mechanism for reopening include Central & International Tax charges

Faceless mechanism for income escaping assessment would not exclude the Central charges and International Taxation charges from its application -…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Ground not adjudicated by 1st appellate authority cannot be decided in 2nd appeal

Ground not adjudicated by first appellate authority or ground not originating from first appellate order cannot be decided in second…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

COVID-19 amounted to a force majeure event – HC directs condonation of delay in filing ITR

High Court directed ITD to consider condonation of delay in filing ITR for four years as the COVID-19 pandemic constituted…

2 days ago