penalty 271(1)(c)

  • Income Tax

Law does not debar assessee from making claim which he believes is plausible

Law does not debar assessee from making a claim which he believes is plausible and knowing that it will be…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) upheld despite notice without specifying applicable charge

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) upheld despite notice without striking off the not applicable charge as in penalty order AO specified the…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Concealment Penalty cannot be levied on rejection of a bona-fide claim

Concealment Penalty cannot be levied on rejection of a bonafide claim. Even assessee with great expertise could make silly mistake…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty proceedings initiated on one limb & penalty imposed on two limbs invalid

Penalty proceedings initiated on one limb and penalty imposed on two limbs invalid   ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3336 (2020)…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Non striking of limb of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Appeal to be restored on favourable judgment by SC

Non striking of applicable limb of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in notice. ITAT permits restoration of appeal if issue is decided…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Concealment penalty deleted. Assessee wasn’t habitual defaulter, surrendered to buy peace

Concealment penalty deleted as assessee was not habitual defaulter, made surrender only to buy peace and did not contest the…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on notional interest on debit balances in capital account of some partners deleted

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on disallowance of notional interest on debit balances in capital account of some of the partners deleted…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

No penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c) on preponderance of probabilities – ITAT

No penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c) on preponderance of probabilities and Revenue has to prove that claim of expenses…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted. Employee misguided by employer coop. bank that interest income was exempt

Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted as employee was misguided by employer cooperative bank that interest income was exempt ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

An order passed in ignorance of binding precedents is erroneous. ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

An order passed in ignorance of binding precedents is erroneous. ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when in subsequent year it…

5 years ago