penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for inadvertent error of accountant deleted as conduct not found contumacious

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for inadvertent error of accountant deleted as assessee revised belated return and his conduct was not contumacious…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Genuine expenses wrongly claimed as deduction do not attract penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

Genuine expenses wrongly claimed as deduction not attract penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing the inaccurate particular of income ABCAUS Case…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of exemption u/s 10 for agricultural land not liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c). ITAT deleted penalty

Claim of exemption u/s 10 for agricultural land not liable to penalty u/s 271(1)(c). ITAT directed Assessing Officer to delete…

4 years ago
  • Income Tax

Concealment penalty deleted for excess salary appearing in Form 26AS on revision by employer

Concealment penalty deleted for excess salary appearing in Form 26AS on revision by employer. ITAT accepted assessee's explanation as bonafide…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on notional interest on debit balances in capital account of some partners deleted

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on disallowance of notional interest on debit balances in capital account of some of the partners deleted…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

No penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c) on preponderance of probabilities – ITAT

No penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c) on preponderance of probabilities and Revenue has to prove that claim of expenses…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted. Employee misguided by employer coop. bank that interest income was exempt

Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted as employee was misguided by employer cooperative bank that interest income was exempt ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) without specifying specific charge quashed. decisions relied by Revenue rejected

Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) without specifying specific charge quashed. The decisions relied by Revenue rejected by the Tribunal   ABCAUS…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

Application of correct limb of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is a question of fact not of law – ITAT

Application of correct limb of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is a question of fact and not a question of law. ITAT…

5 years ago
  • Income Tax

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for mere disallowance in quantum proceedings

No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for mere disallowance in quantum proceedings in the absence of any falsity in the explanation offered…

5 years ago