Question of ITC in Building Construction Material such as Angle, Cement, H.R. Sheets, Channel, Cylinder etc. under UPVAT – High Court admits Petition
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2788 (2019) (02) HC
The respondent company had claimed Input Tax Credit (I.T.C.) in regard to the Building Construction Material such as Angle, Cement, H.R. Sheets, Channel, Cylinder etc. which was disallowed by the UP VAT Assessing Authority.
Feeling aggrieved by that order, the dealer preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority which was also rejected.
The dealer preferred second appeal before the Commercial Tax Tribunal, which was allowed.
Aggrieved, the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P. has preferred this revision petition before the High Court.
It was contended on behalf of the UP VAT Authorities that the capital goods have been defined in Section 2(f) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act and it does not cover the building material as capital goods.
The High Court has admitted the petition on found force in the above argument.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…